Use latest available pr_lvl() instead of older printk(KERN_LVL)
Just a upgrade of print utilities usage no functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rahul Tanwar <rtanwar@maxlinear.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
index 5cd51f25f446..fcc6f1b7818f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static void __init dtb_add_ioapic(struct device_node *dn)
 
 	ret = of_address_to_resource(dn, 0, &r);
 	if (ret) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "Can't obtain address from device node %pOF.\n", dn);
+		pr_err("Can't obtain address from device node %pOF.\n", dn);
 		return;
 	}
 	mp_register_ioapic(++ioapic_id, r.start, gsi_top, &cfg);
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void __init dtb_ioapic_setup(void)
 		of_ioapic = 1;
 		return;
 	}
-	printk(KERN_ERR "Error: No information about IO-APIC in OF.\n");
+	pr_err("Error: No information about IO-APIC in OF.\n");
 }
 #else
 static void __init dtb_ioapic_setup(void) {}
-- 
2.17.1