drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
This is no bugfix (so no Fixes: tag is necessary) as it is
taken care of in hid_sensor_custom_add_attributes().
The motivation for this patch is that:
hid_sensor_custom_field.attr_name and
hid_sensor_custom_field.attrs
has the size of HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS and used in same context.
We compare against HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS when
looping through hid_custom_attrs.
We will silent the smatch error:
hid_sensor_custom_add_attributes() error: buffer overflow
'hid_custom_attrs' 8 <= 10
Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
index 32c2306e240d..602465ad2745 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct hid_sensor_sample {
u32 raw_len;
} __packed;
-static struct attribute hid_custom_attrs[] = {
+static struct attribute hid_custom_attrs[HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS] = {
{.name = "name", .mode = S_IRUGO},
{.name = "units", .mode = S_IRUGO},
{.name = "unit-expo", .mode = S_IRUGO},
--
2.38.1
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, Marcus Folkesson wrote: > This is no bugfix (so no Fixes: tag is necessary) as it is > taken care of in hid_sensor_custom_add_attributes(). > > The motivation for this patch is that: > hid_sensor_custom_field.attr_name and > hid_sensor_custom_field.attrs > has the size of HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS and used in same context. > > We compare against HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS when > looping through hid_custom_attrs. > > We will silent the smatch error: > hid_sensor_custom_add_attributes() error: buffer overflow > 'hid_custom_attrs' 8 <= 10 > > Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com> > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Applied to hid.git#for-6.2/sensor. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:13:26PM +0100, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> This is no bugfix (so no Fixes: tag is necessary) as it is
> taken care of in hid_sensor_custom_add_attributes().
>
> The motivation for this patch is that:
> hid_sensor_custom_field.attr_name and
> hid_sensor_custom_field.attrs
> has the size of HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS and used in same context.
>
> We compare against HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS when
> looping through hid_custom_attrs.
>
> We will silent the smatch error:
> hid_sensor_custom_add_attributes() error: buffer overflow
> 'hid_custom_attrs' 8 <= 10
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
v2:
- add acked-by tag
> drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
> index 32c2306e240d..602465ad2745 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct hid_sensor_sample {
> u32 raw_len;
> } __packed;
>
> -static struct attribute hid_custom_attrs[] = {
> +static struct attribute hid_custom_attrs[HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS] = {
> {.name = "name", .mode = S_IRUGO},
> {.name = "units", .mode = S_IRUGO},
> {.name = "unit-expo", .mode = S_IRUGO},
> --
> 2.38.1
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.