arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Use defines for RPMh power domains instead of hard-coding numbers.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
index d1b64280ab0b..136fa5360e8e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
@@ -2074,8 +2074,8 @@ remoteproc_slpi: remoteproc@2400000 {
clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
clock-names = "xo";
- power-domains = <&rpmhpd 3>,
- <&rpmhpd 2>;
+ power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8150_LCX>,
+ <&rpmhpd SM8150_LMX>;
power-domain-names = "lcx", "lmx";
memory-region = <&slpi_mem>;
@@ -2619,8 +2619,8 @@ remoteproc_mpss: remoteproc@4080000 {
clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
clock-names = "xo";
- power-domains = <&rpmhpd 7>,
- <&rpmhpd 0>;
+ power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8150_CX>,
+ <&rpmhpd SM8150_MSS>;
power-domain-names = "cx", "mss";
memory-region = <&mpss_mem>;
@@ -3246,7 +3246,7 @@ remoteproc_cdsp: remoteproc@8300000 {
clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
clock-names = "xo";
- power-domains = <&rpmhpd 7>;
+ power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8150_CX>;
memory-region = <&cdsp_mem>;
@@ -3747,7 +3747,7 @@ remoteproc_adsp: remoteproc@17300000 {
clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
clock-names = "xo";
- power-domains = <&rpmhpd 7>;
+ power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8150_CX>;
memory-region = <&adsp_mem>;
--
2.34.1
On 16/11/2022 16:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Use defines for RPMh power domains instead of hard-coding numbers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
I sent exactly the same patch yesterday.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/ef2057cb-8de8-4d65-2749-cfc205833eb4@linaro.org/T/#m4196988be896c461131ee11df51dcdd5b9cdcdc2
Konrad
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
> index d1b64280ab0b..136fa5360e8e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
> @@ -2074,8 +2074,8 @@ remoteproc_slpi: remoteproc@2400000 {
> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
> clock-names = "xo";
>
> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd 3>,
> - <&rpmhpd 2>;
> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8150_LCX>,
> + <&rpmhpd SM8150_LMX>;
> power-domain-names = "lcx", "lmx";
>
> memory-region = <&slpi_mem>;
> @@ -2619,8 +2619,8 @@ remoteproc_mpss: remoteproc@4080000 {
> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
> clock-names = "xo";
>
> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd 7>,
> - <&rpmhpd 0>;
> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8150_CX>,
> + <&rpmhpd SM8150_MSS>;
> power-domain-names = "cx", "mss";
>
> memory-region = <&mpss_mem>;
> @@ -3246,7 +3246,7 @@ remoteproc_cdsp: remoteproc@8300000 {
> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
> clock-names = "xo";
>
> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd 7>;
> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8150_CX>;
>
> memory-region = <&cdsp_mem>;
>
> @@ -3747,7 +3747,7 @@ remoteproc_adsp: remoteproc@17300000 {
> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
> clock-names = "xo";
>
> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd 7>;
> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8150_CX>;
>
> memory-region = <&adsp_mem>;
>
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 at 16:58, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote: > On 16/11/2022 16:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Use defines for RPMh power domains instead of hard-coding numbers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > --- > I sent exactly the same patch yesterday. Then the same as me I think you miss remoteproc@4080000. :)
On 16/11/2022 17:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 at 16:58, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 16/11/2022 16:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Use defines for RPMh power domains instead of hard-coding numbers. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >>> --- >> I sent exactly the same patch yesterday. > > Then the same as me I think you miss remoteproc@4080000. :) Uh.. unless I don't get what you mean, I think we both covered it. Konrad
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 at 17:34, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On 16/11/2022 17:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 at 16:58, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On 16/11/2022 16:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> Use defines for RPMh power domains instead of hard-coding numbers. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > >>> --- > >> I sent exactly the same patch yesterday. > > > > Then the same as me I think you miss remoteproc@4080000. :) > Uh.. unless I don't get what you mean, I think we both covered it. Right, different one: mmc@8804000
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.