arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 4 + arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-evm.dtso | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-evm.dtso
Hello all, These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but wanted to test the water with this one. For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it, so double checks here very welcome. Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html Thanks, Andrew Changes from v1: - Made touchscreen node name generic - Used proper interrupt flags Andrew Davis (2): ARM: dts: ti: Add AM57xx GP EVM board support ARM: dts: ti: Add AM57xx GP EVM Rev A3 board support arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 4 + arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-evm.dtso | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-evm.dtso -- 2.37.3
Hi Andrew & Rob,
* Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]:
> Hello all,
>
> These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the
> TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but
> wanted to test the water with this one.
>
> For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this
> will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran
> it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it,
> so double checks here very welcome.
>
> Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html
Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename'
into dt/next") in Linux next.
Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above?
Regards,
Tony
On 11/9/22 2:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi Andrew & Rob,
>
> * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the
>> TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but
>> wanted to test the water with this one.
>>
>> For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this
>> will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran
>> it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it,
>> so double checks here very welcome.
>>
>> Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html
>
> Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename'
> into dt/next") in Linux next.
>
> Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above?
>
26c9134a370a is the same (v2) as the series (v1) I pointed to in the
commit message. This series works on top of either.
Thanks,
Andrew
> Regards,
>
> Tony
* Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221109 18:31]:
> On 11/9/22 2:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi Andrew & Rob,
> >
> > * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the
> > > TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but
> > > wanted to test the water with this one.
> > >
> > > For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this
> > > will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran
> > > it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it,
> > > so double checks here very welcome.
> > >
> > > Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html
> >
> > Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename'
> > into dt/next") in Linux next.
> >
> > Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above?
> >
>
> 26c9134a370a is the same (v2) as the series (v1) I pointed to in the
> commit message. This series works on top of either.
Rob, are those commits immutable and OK to use as a base?
Regards,
Tony
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [221110 07:05]:
> * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221109 18:31]:
> > On 11/9/22 2:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew & Rob,
> > >
> > > * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the
> > > > TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but
> > > > wanted to test the water with this one.
> > > >
> > > > For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this
> > > > will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran
> > > > it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it,
> > > > so double checks here very welcome.
> > > >
> > > > Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html
> > >
> > > Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename'
> > > into dt/next") in Linux next.
> > >
> > > Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above?
> > >
> >
> > 26c9134a370a is the same (v2) as the series (v1) I pointed to in the
> > commit message. This series works on top of either.
>
> Rob, are those commits immutable and OK to use as a base?
Andrew, I'm untagging these from my inbox, please resend when suitable.
Regards,
Tony
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.