On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:32:11PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> In the reset assert and deassert callbacks, the supplied "id" is not used
> at all and only the hba reset is performed all the time. So there is no
> reason to use a WARN_ON on the "id".
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index 7cd996ac180b..8bb0f4415f1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -895,8 +895,6 @@ ufs_qcom_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned long id)
> {
> struct ufs_qcom_host *host = rcdev_to_ufs_host(rcdev);
>
> - /* Currently this code only knows about a single reset. */
> - WARN_ON(id);
> ufs_qcom_assert_reset(host->hba);
> /* provide 1ms delay to let the reset pulse propagate. */
> usleep_range(1000, 1100);
> @@ -908,8 +906,6 @@ ufs_qcom_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned long id)
> {
> struct ufs_qcom_host *host = rcdev_to_ufs_host(rcdev);
>
> - /* Currently this code only knows about a single reset. */
> - WARN_ON(id);
> ufs_qcom_deassert_reset(host->hba);
>
> /*
> --
> 2.25.1
>