[PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: Expect specific type for monitored-battery

Krzysztof Kozlowski posted 1 patch 3 years, 5 months ago
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ene-kb930.yaml      | 4 +++-
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk817.yaml | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: Expect specific type for monitored-battery
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 3 years, 5 months ago
Core schema does not define type of monitored-battery, so the schemas
are expected to reference proper type.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ene-kb930.yaml      | 4 +++-
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk817.yaml | 1 +
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ene-kb930.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ene-kb930.yaml
index 06ed9ec8f4bb..b4c6f9529ce1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ene-kb930.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ene-kb930.yaml
@@ -22,7 +22,9 @@ properties:
   reg:
     maxItems: 1
 
-  monitored-battery: true
+  monitored-battery:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
+
   power-supplies: true
   system-power-controller: true
 
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk817.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk817.yaml
index 935e17099213..d136a05c7758 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk817.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk817.yaml
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ properties:
     type: object
     properties:
       monitored-battery:
+        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
         description: |
           A phandle to a monitored battery node that contains a valid
           value for:
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: Expect specific type for monitored-battery
Posted by Lee Jones 3 years, 5 months ago
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> Core schema does not define type of monitored-battery, so the schemas
> are expected to reference proper type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ene-kb930.yaml      | 4 +++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk817.yaml | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: Expect specific type for monitored-battery
Posted by Rob Herring 3 years, 5 months ago
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 08:49:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> > Core schema does not define type of monitored-battery, so the schemas
> > are expected to reference proper type.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ene-kb930.yaml      | 4 +++-
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk817.yaml | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Applied, thanks.

NAK. Please drop or revert.

Rob
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: Expect specific type for monitored-battery
Posted by Lee Jones 3 years, 5 months ago
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 08:49:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Oct 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 
> > > Core schema does not define type of monitored-battery, so the schemas
> > > are expected to reference proper type.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ene-kb930.yaml      | 4 +++-
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk817.yaml | 1 +
> > >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Applied, thanks.
> 
> NAK. Please drop or revert.

Dropping is not a problem.

Would you mind providing some context?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: Expect specific type for monitored-battery
Posted by Rob Herring 3 years, 5 months ago
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 5:25 AM Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2022, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 08:49:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >
> > > > Core schema does not define type of monitored-battery, so the schemas
> > > > are expected to reference proper type.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ene-kb930.yaml      | 4 +++-
> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk817.yaml | 1 +
> > > >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks.
> >
> > NAK. Please drop or revert.
>
> Dropping is not a problem.
>
> Would you mind providing some context?

I did elsewhere in the series, but simply we don't want to define a
type for a property multiple times. It should be defined once
somewhere common.

Rob
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: Expect specific type for monitored-battery
Posted by Lee Jones 3 years, 5 months ago
On Tue, 01 Nov 2022, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 5:25 AM Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Oct 2022, Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 08:49:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Core schema does not define type of monitored-battery, so the schemas
> > > > > are expected to reference proper type.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ene-kb930.yaml      | 4 +++-
> > > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk817.yaml | 1 +
> > > > >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > Applied, thanks.
> > >
> > > NAK. Please drop or revert.
> >
> > Dropping is not a problem.
> >
> > Would you mind providing some context?
> 
> I did elsewhere in the series, but simply we don't want to define a
> type for a property multiple times. It should be defined once
> somewhere common.

ACK, thanks.

Dropped.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]