Makefile | 4 ++-- fs/splice.c | 10 ++++++---- net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h | 4 ++-- net/mac80211/mlme.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- net/mac80211/scan.c | 2 ++ net/mac80211/util.c | 11 ++++++----- 6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.149 release.
There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.149-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux 5.10.149-rc1
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
wifi: mac80211: fix MBSSID parsing use-after-free
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
wifi: mac80211: don't parse mbssid in assoc response
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
mac80211: mlme: find auth challenge directly
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Revert "fs: check FMODE_LSEEK to control internal pipe splicing"
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++--
fs/splice.c | 10 ++++++----
net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h | 4 ++--
net/mac80211/mlme.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
net/mac80211/scan.c | 2 ++
net/mac80211/util.c | 11 ++++++-----
6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
On 10/16/22 00:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.149 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.149-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> thanks, -- Shuah
On 10/15/22 23:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.149 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.149-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC: Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> -- Florian
Hi Greg, On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 08:46:10AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.149 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220925): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2011 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2012 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk> -- Regards Sudip
On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 at 12:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.149 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.149-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro's test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> ## Build * kernel: 5.10.149-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: ac0fb49345eeba8af1ef393f8921b7fbe4e3f99f * git describe: v5.10.148-5-gac0fb49345ee * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.148-5-gac0fb49345ee ## No Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.147-55-g4ff6e9bba3ff) ## No Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.147-55-g4ff6e9bba3ff) ## No Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.147-55-g4ff6e9bba3ff) ## No Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.147-55-g4ff6e9bba3ff) ## Test result summary total: 108684, pass: 93951, fail: 1340, skip: 13134, xfail: 259 ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 333 total, 333 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 65 total, 63 passed, 2 failed * i386: 55 total, 53 passed, 2 failed * mips: 56 total, 56 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 60 total, 55 passed, 5 failed * riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * s390: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 58 total, 56 passed, 2 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance * vdso -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 08:46:10AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.149 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 163 pass: 163 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 475 pass: 475 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Guenter
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.149 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Linux 5.10.149-rc1
>
> Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> wifi: mac80211: fix MBSSID parsing use-after-free
>
> Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> wifi: mac80211: don't parse mbssid in assoc response
>
> Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> mac80211: mlme: find auth challenge directly
>
> Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> Revert "fs: check FMODE_LSEEK to control internal pipe splicing"
But I'm confused. Queue seems to contain different stuff, and I see
these patches only in origin/linux-5.10.y.
43e0669893b3a57024beab4348b1038cf7b98af8 (origin/queue/5.10) regulator: qcom_rpm: Fix circular deferral regression
50af1850d6adaccd414656e51e66aa2192f7786a hwmon: (gsc-hwmon) Call of_node_get() before of_find_xxx API
7c8b9726479b0ee1275969c6e7b66bf0f6f701eb ASoC: wcd934x: fix order of Slimbus unprepare/disable
f010aef6ae5b81511f57f71175f2f46e98e22f42 ASoC: wcd9335: fix order of Slimbus unprepare/disable
ee39e253def995ca56788c767aba109070cec058 platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: Update version on GET_NEXT_EVENT failure
daa9a833bc179da7a759b35f70e3bd594d5dab5a quota: Check next/prev free block number after reading from quota file
d76384203c14e0afef7730a2a3016aac60ca8a79 HID: multitouch: Add memory barriers
..
79994c46b1cb8efd35211d95dbdf79c21173b17a ALSA: rawmidi: Drop register_mutex in snd_rawmidi_free()
65cb91292340d565b98fa6f661cdb7465f4c9d67 ALSA: oss: Fix potential deadlock at unregistration
3783e64fee4a624f3ed1d7d6ae630890922edb7b (tag: v5.10.148) Linux 5.10.148
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 08:46:10AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.149 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Hi Greg, 5.10.149-rc1 tested. Run tested on: - Intel Skylake x86_64 (nuc6 i5-6260U) In addition - build tested for: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - Allwinner H6 - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com> -- Rudi
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.