JZ4755 is a low-power SoC similar to JZ4725B which is already here.

The patch adds compatibles for parts which aren't implemented yet and
they are subject of this patch serie.

Signed-off-by: Siarhei Volkau <lis8215@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.yaml   | 2 ++
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,dma.yaml     | 1 +
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/ingenic,uart.yaml | 4 ++++
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.yaml
index aa1df03ef..df256ebcd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.yaml
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ select:
         enum:
           - ingenic,jz4740-cgu
           - ingenic,jz4725b-cgu
+          - ingenic,jz4755-cgu
           - ingenic,jz4760-cgu
           - ingenic,jz4760b-cgu
           - ingenic,jz4770-cgu
@@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ properties:
       - enum:
           - ingenic,jz4740-cgu
           - ingenic,jz4725b-cgu
+          - ingenic,jz4755-cgu
           - ingenic,jz4760-cgu
           - ingenic,jz4760b-cgu
           - ingenic,jz4770-cgu
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,dma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,dma.yaml
index 3b0b3b919..e42b8ce94 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,dma.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,dma.yaml
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
       - enum:
           - ingenic,jz4740-dma
           - ingenic,jz4725b-dma
+          - ingenic,jz4755-dma
           - ingenic,jz4760-dma
           - ingenic,jz4760-bdma
           - ingenic,jz4760-mdma
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/ingenic,uart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/ingenic,uart.yaml
index 9ca7a18ec..315ceb722 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/ingenic,uart.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/ingenic,uart.yaml
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties:
     oneOf:
       - enum:
           - ingenic,jz4740-uart
+          - ingenic,jz4750-uart
           - ingenic,jz4760-uart
           - ingenic,jz4780-uart
           - ingenic,x1000-uart
@@ -31,6 +32,9 @@ properties:
       - items:
           - const: ingenic,jz4725b-uart
           - const: ingenic,jz4740-uart
+      - items:
+          - const: ingenic,jz4755-uart
+          - const: ingenic,jz4750-uart
 
   reg:
     maxItems: 1
-- 
2.36.1

On 09/10/2022 14:13, Siarhei Volkau wrote:
> JZ4755 is a low-power SoC similar to JZ4725B which is already here.
> 
> The patch adds compatibles for parts which aren't implemented yet and
> they are subject of this patch serie.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Siarhei Volkau <lis8215@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.yaml   | 2 ++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,dma.yaml     | 1 +
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/ingenic,uart.yaml | 4 ++++

How do you plan to merge it? Usually these go via subsystem trees...


Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>


Best regards,
Krzysztof

пн, 10 окт. 2022 г. в 17:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>:

> How do you plan to merge it? Usually these go via subsystem trees...

It's a new case for me, could you explain the problem a bit more?
What things should I bother with in the next patchset version?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Siarhei,

Le lun., oct. 10 2022 at 23:18:05 +0300, Siarhei Volkau 
<lis8215@gmail.com> a écrit :
> пн, 10 окт. 2022 г. в 17:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>:
> 
>>  How do you plan to merge it? Usually these go via subsystem trees...
> 
> It's a new case for me, could you explain the problem a bit more?
> What things should I bother with in the next patchset version?
> Thanks in advance.

Just split the patchset, most of your patches (e.g. DMA patch, CGU, 
pinctrl, UART) should be sent separately.

Otherwise it makes things much more complicated for merging.

Cheers,
-Paul

On 10/10/2022 16:18, Siarhei Volkau wrote:
> пн, 10 окт. 2022 г. в 17:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>:
> 
>> How do you plan to merge it? Usually these go via subsystem trees...
> 
> It's a new case for me, could you explain the problem a bit more?
> What things should I bother with in the next patchset version?
> Thanks in advance.

Each binding goes via subsystem maintainer, not via DT bindings tree, so
keeping all in one patch messes with that.

Best regards,
Krzysztof