[PATCH] perf mem: Fix -C option behavior for perf mem record

Namhyung Kim posted 1 patch 3 years, 6 months ago
tools/perf/builtin-mem.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
[PATCH] perf mem: Fix -C option behavior for perf mem record
Posted by Namhyung Kim 3 years, 6 months ago
The -C/--cpu option was maily for report but it also affected record as
it ate the option.  So users needed to use "--" after perf mem record to
pass the info to the perf record properly.

Check if this option is set for record, and pass it to the actual perf
record.

Before)
  $ sudo perf --debug perf-event-open mem record -C 0 2>&1 | grep -a sys_perf_event_open
  ...
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 4
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 1  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 5
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 2  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 6
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 3  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 7
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 8
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 1  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 9
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 2  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 10
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 3  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 11
  ...

After)
  $ sudo perf --debug perf-event-open mem record -C 0 2>&1 | grep -a sys_perf_event_open
  ...
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 4
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 5
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 6
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 7

Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-mem.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
index 9e435fd23503..02e7a5dbeb00 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
@@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
 	else
 		rec_argc = argc + 9 * perf_pmu__hybrid_pmu_num();
 
+	if (mem->cpu_list)
+		rec_argc += 2;
+
 	rec_argv = calloc(rec_argc + 1, sizeof(char *));
 	if (!rec_argv)
 		return -1;
@@ -158,6 +161,11 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
 	if (all_kernel)
 		rec_argv[i++] = "--all-kernel";
 
+	if (mem->cpu_list) {
+		rec_argv[i++] = "-C";
+		rec_argv[i++] = mem->cpu_list;
+	}
+
 	for (j = 0; j < argc; j++, i++)
 		rec_argv[i] = argv[j];
 
-- 
2.38.0.rc1.362.ged0d419d3c-goog
Re: [PATCH] perf mem: Fix -C option behavior for perf mem record
Posted by Leo Yan 3 years, 6 months ago
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 01:02:11PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The -C/--cpu option was maily for report but it also affected record as
> it ate the option.  So users needed to use "--" after perf mem record to
> pass the info to the perf record properly.
> 
> Check if this option is set for record, and pass it to the actual perf
> record.
> 
> Before)
>   $ sudo perf --debug perf-event-open mem record -C 0 2>&1 | grep -a sys_perf_event_open
>   ...
>   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 4
>   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 1  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 5
>   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 2  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 6
>   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 3  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 7
>   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 8
>   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 1  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 9
>   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 2  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 10
>   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 3  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 11
>   ...
> 
> After)
>   $ sudo perf --debug perf-event-open mem record -C 0 2>&1 | grep -a sys_perf_event_open
>   ...
>   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 4
>   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 5
>   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 6
>   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 7
> 
> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> Reported-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

The change LGTM:

Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Re: [PATCH] perf mem: Fix -C option behavior for perf mem record
Posted by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 3 years, 5 months ago
Em Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 02:01:54PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 01:02:11PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > The -C/--cpu option was maily for report but it also affected record as
> > it ate the option.  So users needed to use "--" after perf mem record to
> > pass the info to the perf record properly.
> > 
> > Check if this option is set for record, and pass it to the actual perf
> > record.
> > 
> > Before)
> >   $ sudo perf --debug perf-event-open mem record -C 0 2>&1 | grep -a sys_perf_event_open
> >   ...
> >   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 4
> >   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 1  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 5
> >   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 2  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 6
> >   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 3  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 7
> >   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 8
> >   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 1  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 9
> >   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 2  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 10
> >   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 3  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 11
> >   ...
> > 
> > After)
> >   $ sudo perf --debug perf-event-open mem record -C 0 2>&1 | grep -a sys_perf_event_open
> >   ...
> >   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 4
> >   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 5
> >   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 6
> >   sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 0  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 7
> > 
> > Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > Reported-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> 
> The change LGTM:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo