[PATCH v4 6/7] pwm: lpss: Make use of bits.h macros for all masks

Andy Shevchenko posted 7 patches 3 years, 6 months ago
[PATCH v4 6/7] pwm: lpss: Make use of bits.h macros for all masks
Posted by Andy Shevchenko 3 years, 6 months ago
Make use of the GENMASK() (far less error-prone, far more concise).

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
index a20915459809..accdef5dd58e 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
  * Author: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
  */
 
+#include <linux/bits.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/iopoll.h>
@@ -26,7 +27,7 @@
 #define PWM_ENABLE			BIT(31)
 #define PWM_SW_UPDATE			BIT(30)
 #define PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT		8
-#define PWM_ON_TIME_DIV_MASK		0x000000ff
+#define PWM_ON_TIME_DIV_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
 
 /* Size of each PWM register space if multiple */
 #define PWM_SIZE			0x400
-- 
2.35.1

Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] pwm: lpss: Make use of bits.h macros for all masks
Posted by Thierry Reding 3 years, 6 months ago
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 07:24:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Make use of the GENMASK() (far less error-prone, far more concise).

Very subjective.

Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] pwm: lpss: Make use of bits.h macros for all masks
Posted by Andy Shevchenko 3 years, 6 months ago
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:20:46PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 07:24:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Make use of the GENMASK() (far less error-prone, far more concise).
> 
> Very subjective.

See an example why not: 0a90ed8d0cfa ("platform/x86: pmc_atom: Fix SLP_TYPx
bitfield mask").

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] pwm: lpss: Make use of bits.h macros for all masks
Posted by Thierry Reding 3 years, 6 months ago
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 05:43:07PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:20:46PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 07:24:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Make use of the GENMASK() (far less error-prone, far more concise).
> > 
> > Very subjective.
> 
> See an example why not: 0a90ed8d0cfa ("platform/x86: pmc_atom: Fix SLP_TYPx
> bitfield mask").

Hardly comparable to this particular case. And really this is stuff
that's getting on my nerves. People constantly replacing perfectly fine
code with something equivalent just for the sake of it.

Thierry