Another functionality of FLEXCOM is that of SPI. In order for
the proper validation of the SPI children nodes through the binding
to occur, the proper binding for SPI must be referenced.
Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
v1 -> v2:
- use full schema paths
v2 -> v3:
- Added Reviewed-by tag, previously this was [PATCH 3]
v3 -> v4:
- Nothing, previously this was [PATCH 5]
v4 -> v5:
- Nothing
.../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml
index 0c80f4e98c54..f283cfd84b2d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml
@@ -78,10 +78,9 @@ patternProperties:
of USART bindings.
"^spi@[0-9a-f]+$":
- type: object
+ $ref: /schemas/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml
description:
- Child node describing SPI. See ../spi/spi_atmel.txt for details
- of SPI bindings.
+ Child node describing SPI.
"^i2c@[0-9a-f]+$":
$ref: /schemas/i2c/atmel,at91sam-i2c.yaml
--
2.34.1
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Sergiu Moga wrote: > Another functionality of FLEXCOM is that of SPI. In order for > the proper validation of the SPI children nodes through the binding > to occur, the proper binding for SPI must be referenced. > > Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@microchip.com> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > --- > > > v1 -> v2: > - use full schema paths > > > v2 -> v3: > - Added Reviewed-by tag, previously this was [PATCH 3] > > > v3 -> v4: > - Nothing, previously this was [PATCH 5] > > > v4 -> v5: > - Nothing > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Not sure how these can be handled. I guess I cannot take these until the other patches are applied. NB: The patch doesn't apply cleanly anyway, so will need to be rebased. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml > index 0c80f4e98c54..f283cfd84b2d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml > @@ -78,10 +78,9 @@ patternProperties: > of USART bindings. > > "^spi@[0-9a-f]+$": > - type: object > + $ref: /schemas/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml > description: > - Child node describing SPI. See ../spi/spi_atmel.txt for details > - of SPI bindings. > + Child node describing SPI. > > "^i2c@[0-9a-f]+$": > $ref: /schemas/i2c/atmel,at91sam-i2c.yaml -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
On 28.09.2022 18:03, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Sergiu Moga wrote: > >> Another functionality of FLEXCOM is that of SPI. In order for >> the proper validation of the SPI children nodes through the binding >> to occur, the proper binding for SPI must be referenced. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@microchip.com> >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >> --- >> >> >> v1 -> v2: >> - use full schema paths >> >> >> v2 -> v3: >> - Added Reviewed-by tag, previously this was [PATCH 3] >> >> >> v3 -> v4: >> - Nothing, previously this was [PATCH 5] >> >> >> v4 -> v5: >> - Nothing >> >> >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml | 5 ++--- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Not sure how these can be handled. > > I guess I cannot take these until the other patches are applied. > > NB: The patch doesn't apply cleanly anyway, so will need to be rebased. > Hello, The sama5d2-flexcom binding related patches are dependent on: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220916075744.1879428-1-kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com/ as specified in the cover letter. Regards, Sergiu >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml >> index 0c80f4e98c54..f283cfd84b2d 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml >> @@ -78,10 +78,9 @@ patternProperties: >> of USART bindings. >> >> "^spi@[0-9a-f]+$": >> - type: object >> + $ref: /schemas/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml >> description: >> - Child node describing SPI. See ../spi/spi_atmel.txt for details >> - of SPI bindings. >> + Child node describing SPI. >> >> "^i2c@[0-9a-f]+$": >> $ref: /schemas/i2c/atmel,at91sam-i2c.yaml > > -- > Lee Jones [李琼斯]
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Sergiu.Moga@microchip.com wrote: > On 28.09.2022 18:03, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Sergiu Moga wrote: > > > >> Another functionality of FLEXCOM is that of SPI. In order for > >> the proper validation of the SPI children nodes through the binding > >> to occur, the proper binding for SPI must be referenced. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@microchip.com> > >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > >> --- > >> > >> > >> v1 -> v2: > >> - use full schema paths > >> > >> > >> v2 -> v3: > >> - Added Reviewed-by tag, previously this was [PATCH 3] > >> > >> > >> v3 -> v4: > >> - Nothing, previously this was [PATCH 5] > >> > >> > >> v4 -> v5: > >> - Nothing > >> > >> > >> > >> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml | 5 ++--- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > Not sure how these can be handled. > > > > I guess I cannot take these until the other patches are applied. > > > > NB: The patch doesn't apply cleanly anyway, so will need to be rebased. > > > > > Hello, > > The sama5d2-flexcom binding related patches are dependent on: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220916075744.1879428-1-kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com/ I would be very cautious about relying on comments made in the cover-letter. Better to make this a hard requirement and place them in the same patch-set. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
On 28.09.2022 18:23, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Sergiu.Moga@microchip.com wrote: > >> On 28.09.2022 18:03, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Sergiu Moga wrote: >>> >>>> Another functionality of FLEXCOM is that of SPI. In order for >>>> the proper validation of the SPI children nodes through the binding >>>> to occur, the proper binding for SPI must be referenced. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@microchip.com> >>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> >>>> v1 -> v2: >>>> - use full schema paths >>>> >>>> >>>> v2 -> v3: >>>> - Added Reviewed-by tag, previously this was [PATCH 3] >>>> >>>> >>>> v3 -> v4: >>>> - Nothing, previously this was [PATCH 5] >>>> >>>> >>>> v4 -> v5: >>>> - Nothing >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml | 5 ++--- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> Not sure how these can be handled. >>> >>> I guess I cannot take these until the other patches are applied. >>> >>> NB: The patch doesn't apply cleanly anyway, so will need to be rebased. >>> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> The sama5d2-flexcom binding related patches are dependent on: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220916075744.1879428-1-kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com/ > > I would be very cautious about relying on comments made in the > cover-letter. Better to make this a hard requirement and place them > in the same patch-set. > > -- > Lee Jones [李琼斯] Understood, my apologies, I will keep this in mind the next time this happens :). Otherwise, by applying the patch series linked above, my sama5d2-flexcom patches should apply cleanly afterwards. Thanks, Sergiu
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Sergiu.Moga@microchip.com wrote: > On 28.09.2022 18:23, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Sergiu.Moga@microchip.com wrote: > > > >> On 28.09.2022 18:03, Lee Jones wrote: > >>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Sergiu Moga wrote: > >>> > >>>> Another functionality of FLEXCOM is that of SPI. In order for > >>>> the proper validation of the SPI children nodes through the binding > >>>> to occur, the proper binding for SPI must be referenced. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@microchip.com> > >>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > >>>> --- > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> v1 -> v2: > >>>> - use full schema paths > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> v2 -> v3: > >>>> - Added Reviewed-by tag, previously this was [PATCH 3] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> v3 -> v4: > >>>> - Nothing, previously this was [PATCH 5] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> v4 -> v5: > >>>> - Nothing > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml | 5 ++--- > >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> Not sure how these can be handled. > >>> > >>> I guess I cannot take these until the other patches are applied. > >>> > >>> NB: The patch doesn't apply cleanly anyway, so will need to be rebased. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> The sama5d2-flexcom binding related patches are dependent on: > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220916075744.1879428-1-kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com/ > > > > I would be very cautious about relying on comments made in the > > cover-letter. Better to make this a hard requirement and place them > > in the same patch-set. > > > > > > Understood, my apologies, I will keep this in mind the next time this > happens :). > > Otherwise, by applying the patch series linked above, my sama5d2-flexcom > patches should apply cleanly afterwards. Please re-send this once the other set has been applied. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.