Fix comments regarding register access based on review feedback[1].

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YppQ7BiqlBDMNsuc@gerhold.net/

Signed-off-by: Alexander Martinz <amartinz@shiftphones.com>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/tfa989x.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/tfa989x.c b/sound/soc/codecs/tfa989x.c
index 1c27429b9af6..b853507e65a8 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/tfa989x.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/tfa989x.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int tfa9890_init(struct regmap *regmap)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	/* unhide keys to allow updating them */
+	/* temporarily allow access to hidden registers */
 	ret = regmap_write(regmap, TFA989X_HIDE_UNHIDE_KEY, 0x5a6b);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int tfa9890_init(struct regmap *regmap)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/* hide keys again */
+	/* hide registers again */
 	ret = regmap_write(regmap, TFA989X_HIDE_UNHIDE_KEY, 0x0000);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-- 
2.37.3

On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:50:14 +0200, Alexander Martinz wrote:
> Fix comments regarding register access based on review feedback[1].
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YppQ7BiqlBDMNsuc@gerhold.net/
> 
> 

Applied to

   broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: codecs: tfa989x: fix register access comments
      commit: 9b9def51e1a6de6cd336ae08884f580ebab7d2b2

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark