drivers/of/device.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Delete the redundant word 'of'.
Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@cdjrlc.com>
---
drivers/of/device.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c
index 75b6cbffa755..6158173b92ad 100644
--- a/drivers/of/device.c
+++ b/drivers/of/device.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
/**
* of_match_device - Tell if a struct device matches an of_device_id list
- * @matches: array of of device match structures to search in
+ * @matches: array of device match structures to search in
* @dev: the of device structure to match against
*
* Used by a driver to check whether an platform_device present in the
--
2.36.1
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 05:49:15PM +0800, Jilin Yuan wrote: > Delete the redundant word 'of'. Again? Sigh. Please read: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqL4GvgFYzGUfhW5pvm4wYGrFaj6gHOYZjnOMuk2zCz67w@mail.gmail.com/ > > Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@cdjrlc.com> Are you sure you are the author? > --- > drivers/of/device.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c > index 75b6cbffa755..6158173b92ad 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/device.c > +++ b/drivers/of/device.c > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ > > /** > * of_match_device - Tell if a struct device matches an of_device_id list > - * @matches: array of of device match structures to search in > + * @matches: array of device match structures to search in > * @dev: the of device structure to match against > * > * Used by a driver to check whether an platform_device present in the > -- > 2.36.1 > >
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 01:58:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 05:49:15PM +0800, Jilin Yuan wrote: > > Delete the redundant word 'of'. > > Again? Sigh. > > Please read: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqL4GvgFYzGUfhW5pvm4wYGrFaj6gHOYZjnOMuk2zCz67w@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@cdjrlc.com> > > Are you sure you are the author? > Hi Rob, Some reviewers sent comments for similar patches from @cdjrlc.com people (including myself at [1]), with some of them requesting changes. However, there are never any responses to these reviews from @cdjrlc.com people, just like ZTE developers sending through cgel.zte ignored review comments [2] (try searching `f:"cdjrlc.com" AND s:"Re:"`, it returns nothing for now). Thanks. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YyclQlws9d7vheDk@debian.me/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/878rn1dd8l.fsf@intel.com/ -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 9:04 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 01:58:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 05:49:15PM +0800, Jilin Yuan wrote: > > > Delete the redundant word 'of'. > > > > Again? Sigh. > > > > Please read: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqL4GvgFYzGUfhW5pvm4wYGrFaj6gHOYZjnOMuk2zCz67w@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@cdjrlc.com> > > > > Are you sure you are the author? > > > > Hi Rob, > > Some reviewers sent comments for similar patches from @cdjrlc.com > people (including myself at [1]), with some of them requesting changes. > However, there are never any responses to these reviews from @cdjrlc.com > people, just like ZTE developers sending through cgel.zte ignored > review comments [2] (try searching `f:"cdjrlc.com" AND s:"Re:"`, it returns > nothing for now). I can't decide whether to fix it correctly myself or leave it to see how many times I can get the same patch. :) Rob
On 9/27/22 19:29, Rob Herring wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> >> Some reviewers sent comments for similar patches from @cdjrlc.com >> people (including myself at [1]), with some of them requesting changes. >> However, there are never any responses to these reviews from @cdjrlc.com >> people, just like ZTE developers sending through cgel.zte ignored >> review comments [2] (try searching `f:"cdjrlc.com" AND s:"Re:"`, it returns >> nothing for now). > > I can't decide whether to fix it correctly myself or leave it to see > how many times I can get the same patch. :) > Hi Rob, I'm not talking about whether this patch should be picked up or not, but rather I'm pointing out the ignoring review behavior of @cdjrlc.com people. Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 7:47 AM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/27/22 19:29, Rob Herring wrote: > >> Hi Rob, > >> > >> Some reviewers sent comments for similar patches from @cdjrlc.com > >> people (including myself at [1]), with some of them requesting changes. > >> However, there are never any responses to these reviews from @cdjrlc.com > >> people, just like ZTE developers sending through cgel.zte ignored > >> review comments [2] (try searching `f:"cdjrlc.com" AND s:"Re:"`, it returns > >> nothing for now). > > > > I can't decide whether to fix it correctly myself or leave it to see > > how many times I can get the same patch. :) > > > > Hi Rob, > > I'm not talking about whether this patch should be picked up or not, but > rather I'm pointing out the ignoring review behavior of @cdjrlc.com people. Yes, I get that. Not responding seems to be a growing behavior not just on these trivial type patches. (Though replying with 'ok' to every review comment is equally annoying.) I suppose there could be some filtering happening such that replies are never received. Rob
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.