Delete the redundant word 'in'.

Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@cdjrlc.com>
---
 arch/um/kernel/physmem.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c b/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c
index e7c7b53a1435..91485119ae67 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ __uml_setup("iomem=", parse_iomem,
 );
 
 /*
- * This list is constructed in parse_iomem and addresses filled in in
+ * This list is constructed in parse_iomem and addresses filled in
  * setup_iomem, both of which run during early boot.  Afterwards, it's
  * unchanged.
  */
-- 
2.36.1

On Thu, 2022-09-08 at 20:54 +0800, wangjianli wrote:
> Delete the redundant word 'in'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@cdjrlc.com>
> ---
>  arch/um/kernel/physmem.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c b/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c
> index e7c7b53a1435..91485119ae67 100644
> --- a/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c
> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ __uml_setup("iomem=", parse_iomem,
>  );
>  
>  /*
> - * This list is constructed in parse_iomem and addresses filled in in
> + * This list is constructed in parse_iomem and addresses filled in
>   * setup_iomem, both of which run during early boot.  Afterwards, it's
> 
Fine, I guess, but honestly - that sentence doesn't parse well either
way. Might be worth addressing that at the same time...

johannes

On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:56 PM Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-09-08 at 20:54 +0800, wangjianli wrote:
> > Delete the redundant word 'in'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@cdjrlc.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/um/kernel/physmem.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c b/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c
> > index e7c7b53a1435..91485119ae67 100644
> > --- a/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c
> > +++ b/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c
> > @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ __uml_setup("iomem=", parse_iomem,
> >  );
> >
> >  /*
> > - * This list is constructed in parse_iomem and addresses filled in in
> > + * This list is constructed in parse_iomem and addresses filled in
> >   * setup_iomem, both of which run during early boot.  Afterwards, it's
> >
> Fine, I guess, but honestly - that sentence doesn't parse well either

Not fine, the repeated "in" is correct.
Q: "Where are addresses filled in?"
A: "In setup_iomem".

> way. Might be worth addressing that at the same time...

addresses are filled in?

General note: please stop submitting these patches for auto-detected
repeated words.  There are too many false positives.
Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds