Wrap complex and repeated code in helper function should_push_task_dl,
which will return true when task p should be pushed to other cores
because of current task.

Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@huawei.com>
---
changes in v2:
- pick a more descriptive function name rather than
should_push_task_away.
- adjust name of args.
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index daa9a7fb5917..d0fa30a3f1b3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1814,6 +1814,15 @@ static void yield_task_dl(struct rq *rq)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 
+static inline bool should_push_task_dl(struct task_struct *curr,
+					struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return unlikely(dl_task(curr)) &&
+	       (curr->nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
+		!dl_entity_preempt(&p->dl, &curr->dl)) &&
+	       p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1;
+}
+
 static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task);
 
 static int
@@ -1840,10 +1849,7 @@ select_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int flags)
 	 * other hand, if it has a shorter deadline, we
 	 * try to make it stay here, it might be important.
 	 */
-	select_rq = unlikely(dl_task(curr)) &&
-		    (curr->nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
-		     !dl_entity_preempt(&p->dl, &curr->dl)) &&
-		    p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1;
+	select_rq = should_push_task_dl(curr, p);
 
 	/*
 	 * Take the capacity of the CPU into account to
@@ -2477,10 +2483,7 @@ static void task_woken_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	if (!task_running(rq, p) &&
 	    !test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr) &&
-	    p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 &&
-	    dl_task(rq->curr) &&
-	    (rq->curr->nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
-	     !dl_entity_preempt(&p->dl, &rq->curr->dl))) {
+	    should_push_task_dl(rq->curr, p)) {
 		push_dl_tasks(rq);
 	}
 }
-- 
2.17.1

On 9/1/22 04:08, Shang XiaoJing wrote:
> Wrap complex and repeated code in helper function should_push_task_dl,
> which will return true when task p should be pushed to other cores
> because of current task.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>

Thanks!
-- Daniel