[PATCH] iio:accel:kxcjk-1013: Fix comments typo

Shaomin Deng posted 1 patch 3 years, 7 months ago
drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] iio:accel:kxcjk-1013: Fix comments typo
Posted by Shaomin Deng 3 years, 7 months ago
Fix double word in comments.

Signed-off-by: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com>
---
 drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
index 94f7b6ac5c87..adc66b3615c0 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
@@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ static int kxcjk1013_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 
 	/*
 	 * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in
-	 * in reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
+	 * reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
 	 * resume operation uses sync mode runtime pm calls, the
 	 * suspend operation will be delayed by autosuspend delay
 	 * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse of
-- 
2.35.1
Re: [PATCH] iio:accel:kxcjk-1013: Fix comments typo
Posted by Jonathan Cameron 3 years, 7 months ago
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:15:55 -0400
Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com> wrote:

> Fix double word in comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com>
Already fixed in the iio tree.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> index 94f7b6ac5c87..adc66b3615c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> @@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ static int kxcjk1013_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in
> -	 * in reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
> +	 * reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
>  	 * resume operation uses sync mode runtime pm calls, the
>  	 * suspend operation will be delayed by autosuspend delay
>  	 * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse of