[PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Drop wbinvd(), no longer required

Ashok Raj posted 1 patch 3 years, 7 months ago
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 12 ------------
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
[PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Drop wbinvd(), no longer required
Posted by Ashok Raj 3 years, 7 months ago
Some older processors had a bad interaction when updating microcode if the
caches were dirty causing machine checks. The wbinvd() was added to
mitigate that before doing microcode updates. Now that Linux checks for the
minimum version before performing an update, those old microcode versions
can't be loaded.  Remove calls to wbinvd().

Depends on Link below:

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220829180436.716672-1-ashok.raj@intel.com/T/#u
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 12 ------------
 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 332ba19e0147..ae3c7ed15e79 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -536,12 +536,6 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
 		return UCODE_OK;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode to avoid
-	 * internal issues depending on what the microcode is updating.
-	 */
-	native_wbinvd();
-
 	/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
 	native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
 
@@ -758,12 +752,6 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode to avoid
-	 * internal issues depending on what the microcode is updating.
-	 */
-	native_wbinvd();
-
 	/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
 	wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
 
-- 
2.32.0
Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Drop wbinvd(), no longer required
Posted by Borislav Petkov 3 years, 7 months ago
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 06:25:57PM +0000, Ashok Raj wrote:
> Depends on Link below:

Please send patches together in a set like everyone else. This one
should simply be part of the min_rev set - not sent separately.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette