[PATCH v3 09/10] sched/psi: cache parent psi_group to speed up groups iterate

Chengming Zhou posted 10 patches 3 years, 7 months ago
[PATCH v3 09/10] sched/psi: cache parent psi_group to speed up groups iterate
Posted by Chengming Zhou 3 years, 7 months ago
We use iterate_groups() to iterate each level psi_group to update
PSI stats, which is a very hot path.

In current code, iterate_groups() have to use multiple branches and
cgroup_parent() to get parent psi_group for each level, which is not
very efficient.

This patch cache parent psi_group in struct psi_group, only need to get
psi_group of task itself first, then just use group->parent to iterate.

Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
---
 include/linux/psi_types.h |  2 ++
 kernel/sched/psi.c        | 47 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/psi_types.h b/include/linux/psi_types.h
index 40c28171cd91..a0b746258c68 100644
--- a/include/linux/psi_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/psi_types.h
@@ -151,6 +151,8 @@ struct psi_trigger {
 };
 
 struct psi_group {
+	struct psi_group *parent;
+
 	/* Protects data used by the aggregator */
 	struct mutex avgs_lock;
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c
index 7aab6f13ed12..814e99b1fed3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
@@ -772,30 +772,18 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
 		schedule_delayed_work(&group->avgs_work, PSI_FREQ);
 }
 
-static struct psi_group *iterate_groups(struct task_struct *task, void **iter)
+static inline struct psi_group *task_psi_group(struct task_struct *task)
 {
-	if (*iter == &psi_system)
-		return NULL;
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
-	if (static_branch_likely(&psi_cgroups_enabled)) {
-		struct cgroup *cgroup = NULL;
-
-		if (!*iter)
-			cgroup = task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp;
-		else
-			cgroup = cgroup_parent(*iter);
-
-		if (cgroup && cgroup_parent(cgroup)) {
-			*iter = cgroup;
-			return cgroup_psi(cgroup);
-		}
-	}
+	if (static_branch_likely(&psi_cgroups_enabled))
+		return cgroup_psi(task_dfl_cgroup(task));
 #endif
-	*iter = &psi_system;
 	return &psi_system;
 }
 
+#define for_each_psi_group(group) \
+	for (; group; group = group->parent)
+
 static void psi_flags_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
 {
 	if (((task->psi_flags & set) ||
@@ -815,7 +803,6 @@ void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
 {
 	int cpu = task_cpu(task);
 	struct psi_group *group;
-	void *iter = NULL;
 	u64 now;
 
 	if (!task->pid)
@@ -825,7 +812,8 @@ void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
 
 	now = cpu_clock(cpu);
 
-	while ((group = iterate_groups(task, &iter)))
+	group = task_psi_group(task);
+	for_each_psi_group(group)
 		psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, true);
 }
 
@@ -834,7 +822,6 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
 {
 	struct psi_group *group, *common = NULL;
 	int cpu = task_cpu(prev);
-	void *iter;
 	u64 now = cpu_clock(cpu);
 
 	if (next->pid) {
@@ -845,8 +832,8 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
 		 * we reach the first common ancestor. Iterate @next's
 		 * ancestors only until we encounter @prev's ONCPU.
 		 */
-		iter = NULL;
-		while ((group = iterate_groups(next, &iter))) {
+		group = task_psi_group(next);
+		for_each_psi_group(group) {
 			if (per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->state_mask &
 			    PSI_ONCPU) {
 				common = group;
@@ -887,9 +874,12 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
 
 		psi_flags_change(prev, clear, set);
 
-		iter = NULL;
-		while ((group = iterate_groups(prev, &iter)) && group != common)
+		group = task_psi_group(prev);
+		for_each_psi_group(group) {
+			if (group == common)
+				break;
 			psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, wake_clock);
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * TSK_ONCPU is handled up to the common ancestor. If we're tasked
@@ -897,7 +887,7 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
 		 */
 		if (sleep || unlikely(prev->in_memstall != next->in_memstall)) {
 			clear &= ~TSK_ONCPU;
-			for (; group; group = iterate_groups(prev, &iter))
+			for_each_psi_group(group)
 				psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, wake_clock);
 		}
 	}
@@ -907,7 +897,6 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
 void psi_account_irqtime(struct task_struct *task, u32 delta)
 {
 	int cpu = task_cpu(task);
-	void *iter = NULL;
 	struct psi_group *group;
 	struct psi_group_cpu *groupc;
 	u64 now;
@@ -917,7 +906,8 @@ void psi_account_irqtime(struct task_struct *task, u32 delta)
 
 	now = cpu_clock(cpu);
 
-	while ((group = iterate_groups(task, &iter))) {
+	group = task_psi_group(task);
+	for_each_psi_group(group) {
 		groupc = per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu);
 
 		write_seqcount_begin(&groupc->seq);
@@ -1009,6 +999,7 @@ int psi_cgroup_alloc(struct cgroup *cgroup)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 	group_init(cgroup->psi);
+	cgroup->psi->parent = cgroup_psi(cgroup_parent(cgroup));
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.37.2
Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] sched/psi: cache parent psi_group to speed up groups iterate
Posted by Johannes Weiner 3 years, 7 months ago
Hi Chengming,

This looks generally good to me, but I have one comment:

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 04:18:28PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> @@ -772,30 +772,18 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
>  		schedule_delayed_work(&group->avgs_work, PSI_FREQ);
>  }
>  
> -static struct psi_group *iterate_groups(struct task_struct *task, void **iter)
> +static inline struct psi_group *task_psi_group(struct task_struct *task)
>  {
> -	if (*iter == &psi_system)
> -		return NULL;
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
> -	if (static_branch_likely(&psi_cgroups_enabled)) {
> -		struct cgroup *cgroup = NULL;
> -
> -		if (!*iter)
> -			cgroup = task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp;
> -		else
> -			cgroup = cgroup_parent(*iter);
> -
> -		if (cgroup && cgroup_parent(cgroup)) {
> -			*iter = cgroup;
> -			return cgroup_psi(cgroup);
> -		}
> -	}
> +	if (static_branch_likely(&psi_cgroups_enabled))
> +		return cgroup_psi(task_dfl_cgroup(task));
>  #endif
> -	*iter = &psi_system;
>  	return &psi_system;
>  }
>  
> +#define for_each_psi_group(group) \
> +	for (; group; group = group->parent)

It would be better to open-code this. It's hiding that it's walking
ancestors, and the name and single parameter suggest it's walking some
global list - not that the parameter is iterator AND starting point.

This makes for particularly obscure code in the discontiguous loops in
psi_task_switch():

	group = task_psi_group(task);
	for_each_psi_group(group)
		if (group == common)
			break;
	/* This looks like a second full loop: */
	for_each_psi_group(group)
		...

>  static void psi_flags_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
>  {
>  	if (((task->psi_flags & set) ||
> @@ -815,7 +803,6 @@ void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
>  {
>  	int cpu = task_cpu(task);
>  	struct psi_group *group;
> -	void *iter = NULL;
>  	u64 now;
>  
>  	if (!task->pid)
> @@ -825,7 +812,8 @@ void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
>  
>  	now = cpu_clock(cpu);
>  
> -	while ((group = iterate_groups(task, &iter)))
> +	group = task_psi_group(task);
> +	for_each_psi_group(group)
>  		psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, true);

task_psi_group() is never NULL, so this should be a do-while loop:

	group = task_psi_group(task);
	do {
		psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, true);
	} while ((group = group->parent));

> @@ -834,7 +822,6 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
>  {
>  	struct psi_group *group, *common = NULL;
>  	int cpu = task_cpu(prev);
> -	void *iter;
>  	u64 now = cpu_clock(cpu);
>  
>  	if (next->pid) {
> @@ -845,8 +832,8 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
>  		 * we reach the first common ancestor. Iterate @next's
>  		 * ancestors only until we encounter @prev's ONCPU.
>  		 */
> -		iter = NULL;
> -		while ((group = iterate_groups(next, &iter))) {
> +		group = task_psi_group(next);
> +		for_each_psi_group(group) {

Ditto.

>  			if (per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->state_mask &
>  			    PSI_ONCPU) {
>  				common = group;
> @@ -887,9 +874,12 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
>  
>  		psi_flags_change(prev, clear, set);
>  
> -		iter = NULL;
> -		while ((group = iterate_groups(prev, &iter)) && group != common)
> +		group = task_psi_group(prev);
> +		for_each_psi_group(group) {
> +			if (group == common)
> +				break;

Ditto.

>  			psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, wake_clock);
> +		}
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * TSK_ONCPU is handled up to the common ancestor. If we're tasked
> @@ -897,7 +887,7 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
>  		 */
>  		if (sleep || unlikely(prev->in_memstall != next->in_memstall)) {
>  			clear &= ~TSK_ONCPU;
> -			for (; group; group = iterate_groups(prev, &iter))
> +			for_each_psi_group(group)
>  				psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, wake_clock);

This can stay as is, group may already be NULL here.

> @@ -907,7 +897,6 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
>  void psi_account_irqtime(struct task_struct *task, u32 delta)
>  {
>  	int cpu = task_cpu(task);
> -	void *iter = NULL;
>  	struct psi_group *group;
>  	struct psi_group_cpu *groupc;
>  	u64 now;
> @@ -917,7 +906,8 @@ void psi_account_irqtime(struct task_struct *task, u32 delta)
>  
>  	now = cpu_clock(cpu);
>  
> -	while ((group = iterate_groups(task, &iter))) {
> +	group = task_psi_group(task);
> +	for_each_psi_group(group) {
>  		groupc = per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu);

do-while again.

With that,
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

Thanks!
Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] sched/psi: cache parent psi_group to speed up groups iterate
Posted by Chengming Zhou 3 years, 7 months ago
On 2022/8/24 18:18, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hi Chengming,
> 
> This looks generally good to me, but I have one comment:
> 
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 04:18:28PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
>> @@ -772,30 +772,18 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
>>  		schedule_delayed_work(&group->avgs_work, PSI_FREQ);
>>  }
>>  
>> -static struct psi_group *iterate_groups(struct task_struct *task, void **iter)
>> +static inline struct psi_group *task_psi_group(struct task_struct *task)
>>  {
>> -	if (*iter == &psi_system)
>> -		return NULL;
>> -
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
>> -	if (static_branch_likely(&psi_cgroups_enabled)) {
>> -		struct cgroup *cgroup = NULL;
>> -
>> -		if (!*iter)
>> -			cgroup = task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp;
>> -		else
>> -			cgroup = cgroup_parent(*iter);
>> -
>> -		if (cgroup && cgroup_parent(cgroup)) {
>> -			*iter = cgroup;
>> -			return cgroup_psi(cgroup);
>> -		}
>> -	}
>> +	if (static_branch_likely(&psi_cgroups_enabled))
>> +		return cgroup_psi(task_dfl_cgroup(task));
>>  #endif
>> -	*iter = &psi_system;
>>  	return &psi_system;
>>  }
>>  
>> +#define for_each_psi_group(group) \
>> +	for (; group; group = group->parent)
> 
> It would be better to open-code this. It's hiding that it's walking
> ancestors, and the name and single parameter suggest it's walking some
> global list - not that the parameter is iterator AND starting point.
> 
> This makes for particularly obscure code in the discontiguous loops in
> psi_task_switch():
> 
> 	group = task_psi_group(task);
> 	for_each_psi_group(group)
> 		if (group == common)
> 			break;
> 	/* This looks like a second full loop: */
> 	for_each_psi_group(group)
> 		...
> 

Good point, it's not clear as open-code, I will change these in next version.

Thanks!


>>  static void psi_flags_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
>>  {
>>  	if (((task->psi_flags & set) ||
>> @@ -815,7 +803,6 @@ void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
>>  {
>>  	int cpu = task_cpu(task);
>>  	struct psi_group *group;
>> -	void *iter = NULL;
>>  	u64 now;
>>  
>>  	if (!task->pid)
>> @@ -825,7 +812,8 @@ void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
>>  
>>  	now = cpu_clock(cpu);
>>  
>> -	while ((group = iterate_groups(task, &iter)))
>> +	group = task_psi_group(task);
>> +	for_each_psi_group(group)
>>  		psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, true);
> 
> task_psi_group() is never NULL, so this should be a do-while loop:
> 
> 	group = task_psi_group(task);
> 	do {
> 		psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, true);
> 	} while ((group = group->parent));
> 
>> @@ -834,7 +822,6 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
>>  {
>>  	struct psi_group *group, *common = NULL;
>>  	int cpu = task_cpu(prev);
>> -	void *iter;
>>  	u64 now = cpu_clock(cpu);
>>  
>>  	if (next->pid) {
>> @@ -845,8 +832,8 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
>>  		 * we reach the first common ancestor. Iterate @next's
>>  		 * ancestors only until we encounter @prev's ONCPU.
>>  		 */
>> -		iter = NULL;
>> -		while ((group = iterate_groups(next, &iter))) {
>> +		group = task_psi_group(next);
>> +		for_each_psi_group(group) {
> 
> Ditto.
> 
>>  			if (per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->state_mask &
>>  			    PSI_ONCPU) {
>>  				common = group;
>> @@ -887,9 +874,12 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
>>  
>>  		psi_flags_change(prev, clear, set);
>>  
>> -		iter = NULL;
>> -		while ((group = iterate_groups(prev, &iter)) && group != common)
>> +		group = task_psi_group(prev);
>> +		for_each_psi_group(group) {
>> +			if (group == common)
>> +				break;
> 
> Ditto.
> 
>>  			psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, wake_clock);
>> +		}
>>  
>>  		/*
>>  		 * TSK_ONCPU is handled up to the common ancestor. If we're tasked
>> @@ -897,7 +887,7 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
>>  		 */
>>  		if (sleep || unlikely(prev->in_memstall != next->in_memstall)) {
>>  			clear &= ~TSK_ONCPU;
>> -			for (; group; group = iterate_groups(prev, &iter))
>> +			for_each_psi_group(group)
>>  				psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, wake_clock);
> 
> This can stay as is, group may already be NULL here.
> 
>> @@ -907,7 +897,6 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
>>  void psi_account_irqtime(struct task_struct *task, u32 delta)
>>  {
>>  	int cpu = task_cpu(task);
>> -	void *iter = NULL;
>>  	struct psi_group *group;
>>  	struct psi_group_cpu *groupc;
>>  	u64 now;
>> @@ -917,7 +906,8 @@ void psi_account_irqtime(struct task_struct *task, u32 delta)
>>  
>>  	now = cpu_clock(cpu);
>>  
>> -	while ((group = iterate_groups(task, &iter))) {
>> +	group = task_psi_group(task);
>> +	for_each_psi_group(group) {
>>  		groupc = per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu);
> 
> do-while again.
> 
> With that,
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> 
> Thanks!