The mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse will parse the smi larbs nodes. if the i+1
larb is parsed fail, we should put_device for the 0..i larbs.
There are two places need to comment:
1) The larbid may be not linear mapping, we should loop whole
the array in the error path.
2) I move this line position: "data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev->dev;"
That means set data->larb_imu[id].dev before the error path.
then we don't need "platform_device_put(plarbdev)" again while
probe_defer case. All depend on "put_device" in the error path in error
cases.
Fixes: d2e9a1102cfc ("iommu/mediatek: Contain MM IOMMU flow with the MM TYPE")
Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
index 9c5902207bef..f63d4210043d 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
@@ -1053,8 +1053,10 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
u32 id;
larbnode = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "mediatek,larbs", i);
- if (!larbnode)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!larbnode) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_larbdev_put;
+ }
if (!of_device_is_available(larbnode)) {
of_node_put(larbnode);
@@ -1067,14 +1069,16 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
plarbdev = of_find_device_by_node(larbnode);
of_node_put(larbnode);
- if (!plarbdev)
- return -ENODEV;
+ if (!plarbdev) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_larbdev_put;
+ }
+ data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev->dev;
if (!plarbdev->dev.driver) {
- platform_device_put(plarbdev);
- return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ goto err_larbdev_put;
}
- data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev->dev;
component_match_add(dev, match, component_compare_dev, &plarbdev->dev);
platform_device_put(plarbdev);
@@ -1082,8 +1086,10 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
/* Get smi-(sub)-common dev from the last larb. */
smi_subcomm_node = of_parse_phandle(larbnode, "mediatek,smi", 0);
- if (!smi_subcomm_node)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!smi_subcomm_node) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_larbdev_put;
+ }
/*
* It may have two level smi-common. the node is smi-sub-common if it
@@ -1097,8 +1103,10 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
pcommdev = of_find_device_by_node(smicomm_node);
of_node_put(smicomm_node);
- if (!pcommdev)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!pcommdev) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_larbdev_put;
+ }
data->smicomm_dev = &pcommdev->dev;
link = device_link_add(data->smicomm_dev, dev,
@@ -1106,9 +1114,19 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
platform_device_put(pcommdev);
if (!link) {
dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s.\n", dev_name(data->smicomm_dev));
- return -EINVAL;
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_larbdev_put;
}
return 0;
+
+err_larbdev_put:
+ /* id may be not linear mapping, loop whole the array */
+ for (i = 0; i < MTK_LARB_NR_MAX; i++) {
+ if (!data->larb_imu[i].dev)
+ continue;
+ put_device(data->larb_imu[i].dev);
+ }
+ return ret;
}
static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
2.18.0
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 02:43:03PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > The mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse will parse the smi larbs nodes. if the i+1 > larb is parsed fail, we should put_device for the 0..i larbs. > > There are two places need to comment: > 1) The larbid may be not linear mapping, we should loop whole > the array in the error path. > 2) I move this line position: "data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev->dev;" > That means set data->larb_imu[id].dev before the error path. > then we don't need "platform_device_put(plarbdev)" again while > probe_defer case. All depend on "put_device" in the error path in error > cases. I don't understand what you're saying here. There is still a platform_device_put(plarbdev) on the success path after component_match_add(). So if we fail when i == 2 then we do: put_device(data->larb_imu[2].dev); But for the previous iterations has both platform_device_put() and put_device() called for them. regards, dan carpenter
Hi Dan, Thanks very much for your review:) On Tue, 2022-08-30 at 11:32 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 02:43:03PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > The mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse will parse the smi larbs nodes. if the > > i+1 > > larb is parsed fail, we should put_device for the 0..i larbs. > > > > There are two places need to comment: > > 1) The larbid may be not linear mapping, we should loop whole > > the array in the error path. > > 2) I move this line position: "data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev- > > >dev;" > > That means set data->larb_imu[id].dev before the error path. > > then we don't need "platform_device_put(plarbdev)" again while > > probe_defer case. All depend on "put_device" in the error path > > in error > > cases. > > I don't understand what you're saying here. There is still a > platform_device_put(plarbdev) on the success path after > component_match_add(). > > So if we fail when i == 2 then we do: > > put_device(data->larb_imu[2].dev); > > But for the previous iterations has both platform_device_put() > and put_device() called for them. Sorry for this. Right! For the goto outside the loop, it did put twice. I will fix this. > > regards, > dan carpenter >
Il 24/08/22 08:43, Yong Wu ha scritto:
> The mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse will parse the smi larbs nodes. if the i+1
> larb is parsed fail, we should put_device for the 0..i larbs.
>
> There are two places need to comment:
> 1) The larbid may be not linear mapping, we should loop whole
> the array in the error path.
> 2) I move this line position: "data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev->dev;"
> That means set data->larb_imu[id].dev before the error path.
> then we don't need "platform_device_put(plarbdev)" again while
> probe_defer case. All depend on "put_device" in the error path in error
> cases.
>
> Fixes: d2e9a1102cfc ("iommu/mediatek: Contain MM IOMMU flow with the MM TYPE")
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 9c5902207bef..f63d4210043d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -1053,8 +1053,10 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
> u32 id;
>
> larbnode = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "mediatek,larbs", i);
> - if (!larbnode)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (!larbnode) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> + }
>
> if (!of_device_is_available(larbnode)) {
> of_node_put(larbnode);
> @@ -1067,14 +1069,16 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
>
> plarbdev = of_find_device_by_node(larbnode);
> of_node_put(larbnode);
> - if (!plarbdev)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (!plarbdev) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> + }
> + data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev->dev;
>
> if (!plarbdev->dev.driver) {
> - platform_device_put(plarbdev);
> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> }
> - data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev->dev;
>
> component_match_add(dev, match, component_compare_dev, &plarbdev->dev);
> platform_device_put(plarbdev);
> @@ -1082,8 +1086,10 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
>
> /* Get smi-(sub)-common dev from the last larb. */
> smi_subcomm_node = of_parse_phandle(larbnode, "mediatek,smi", 0);
> - if (!smi_subcomm_node)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (!smi_subcomm_node) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> + }
>
> /*
> * It may have two level smi-common. the node is smi-sub-common if it
> @@ -1097,8 +1103,10 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
>
> pcommdev = of_find_device_by_node(smicomm_node);
> of_node_put(smicomm_node);
> - if (!pcommdev)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (!pcommdev) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> + }
> data->smicomm_dev = &pcommdev->dev;
>
> link = device_link_add(data->smicomm_dev, dev,
> @@ -1106,9 +1114,19 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
> platform_device_put(pcommdev);
> if (!link) {
> dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s.\n", dev_name(data->smicomm_dev));
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> }
> return 0;
> +
> +err_larbdev_put:
> + /* id may be not linear mapping, loop whole the array */
> + for (i = 0; i < MTK_LARB_NR_MAX; i++) {
Since there may be a case in which the mapping is linear and we're doing teardown,
I think it would be sensible to loop the other way around instead, from
MTK_LARB_NR_MAX to 0.
Everything else looks good to me.
Cheers,
Angelo
> + if (!data->larb_imu[i].dev)
> + continue;
> + put_device(data->larb_imu[i].dev);
> + }
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
On Tue, 2022-08-30 at 10:14 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 24/08/22 08:43, Yong Wu ha scritto:
> > The mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse will parse the smi larbs nodes. if the
> > i+1
> > larb is parsed fail, we should put_device for the 0..i larbs.
> >
> > There are two places need to comment:
> > 1) The larbid may be not linear mapping, we should loop whole
> > the array in the error path.
> > 2) I move this line position: "data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev-
> > >dev;"
> > That means set data->larb_imu[id].dev before the error path.
> > then we don't need "platform_device_put(plarbdev)" again while
> > probe_defer case. All depend on "put_device" in the error path
> > in error
> > cases.
> >
> > Fixes: d2e9a1102cfc ("iommu/mediatek: Contain MM IOMMU flow with
> > the MM TYPE")
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > -------
> > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
[...]
> > +
> > +err_larbdev_put:
> > + /* id may be not linear mapping, loop whole the array */
> > + for (i = 0; i < MTK_LARB_NR_MAX; i++) {
>
> Since there may be a case in which the mapping is linear and we're
> doing teardown,
> I think it would be sensible to loop the other way around instead,
> from
> MTK_LARB_NR_MAX to 0.
Thanks very much. I will change from MTK_LARB_NR_MAX to 0.
>
> Everything else looks good to me.
>
> Cheers,
> Angelo
>
> > + if (!data->larb_imu[i].dev)
> > + continue;
> > + put_device(data->larb_imu[i].dev);
> > + }
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.