[PATCH] iio/accel: fix repeated words in comments

wangjianli posted 1 patch 3 years, 7 months ago
drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] iio/accel: fix repeated words in comments
Posted by wangjianli 3 years, 7 months ago
Delete the redundant word 'in'.

Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@cdjrlc.com>
---
 drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
index 748b35c2f0c3..b073ab12e6a4 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
@@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ static int kxcjk1013_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 
 	/*
 	 * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in
-	 * in reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
+	 * reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
 	 * resume operation uses sync mode runtime pm calls, the
 	 * suspend operation will be delayed by autosuspend delay
 	 * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse of
-- 
2.36.1
Re: [PATCH] iio/accel: fix repeated words in comments
Posted by Jonathan Cameron 3 years, 7 months ago
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 22:00:23 +0800
wangjianli <wangjianli@cdjrlc.com> wrote:

> Delete the redundant word 'in'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@cdjrlc.com>

Applied,

Thanks,

> ---
>  drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> index 748b35c2f0c3..b073ab12e6a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> @@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ static int kxcjk1013_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in
> -	 * in reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
> +	 * reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
>  	 * resume operation uses sync mode runtime pm calls, the
>  	 * suspend operation will be delayed by autosuspend delay
>  	 * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse of