[PATCH] clk/meson: fix repeated words in comments

wangjianli posted 1 patch 3 years, 7 months ago
arch/x86/tools/relocs.c        | 2 +-
drivers/clk/meson/clk-regmap.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH] clk/meson: fix repeated words in comments
Posted by wangjianli 3 years, 7 months ago
 Delete the redundant word 'by'.

Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@cdjrlc.com>
---
 arch/x86/tools/relocs.c        | 2 +-
 drivers/clk/meson/clk-regmap.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c b/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c
index e2c5b296120d..3f8ab8efb674 100644
--- a/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static void walk_relocs(int (*process)(struct section *sec, Elf_Rel *rel,
  *	to the start of the per_cpu area that does not change).
  *
  *	Relocations that apply to the per_cpu area need to have their
- *	offset adjusted by by the value of __per_cpu_load to make them
+ *	offset adjusted by the value of __per_cpu_load to make them
  *	point to the correct place in the loaded image (because the
  *	virtual address of .data..percpu is 0).
  *
diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/clk-regmap.h b/drivers/clk/meson/clk-regmap.h
index e365312da54e..e08a9fa0cc36 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/meson/clk-regmap.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/meson/clk-regmap.h
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
  * @data:	data specific to the clock type
  *
  * Clock which is controlled by regmap backed registers. The actual type of
- * of the clock is controlled by the clock_ops and data.
+ * the clock is controlled by the clock_ops and data.
  */
 struct clk_regmap {
 	struct clk_hw	hw;
-- 
2.36.1
Re: [PATCH] clk/meson: fix repeated words in comments
Posted by Martin Blumenstingl 3 years, 7 months ago
Hello,

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 5:37 PM wangjianli <wangjianli@cdjrlc.com> wrote:
>
>  Delete the redundant word 'by'.
>
> Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@cdjrlc.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/tools/relocs.c        | 2 +-
>  drivers/clk/meson/clk-regmap.h | 2 +-
The clk-regmap.h change is fine but it needs to be separated from the
x86 change.
Can you please send an updated patch?


Thank you and best regards,
Martin