[PATCH] subdev/clk: fix repeated words in comments

wangjianli posted 1 patch 3 years, 7 months ago
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gm20b.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] subdev/clk: fix repeated words in comments
Posted by wangjianli 3 years, 7 months ago
 Delete the redundant word 'at'.

Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@cdjrlc.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gm20b.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gm20b.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gm20b.c
index a139dafffe06..7c33542f651b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gm20b.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gm20b.c
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ gm20b_clk_prog(struct nvkm_clk *base)
 
 	/*
 	 * Interim step for changing DVFS detection settings: low enough
-	 * frequency to be safe at at DVFS coeff = 0.
+	 * frequency to be safe at DVFS coeff = 0.
 	 *
 	 * 1. If voltage is increasing:
 	 * - safe frequency target matches the lowest - old - frequency
-- 
2.36.1
Re: [PATCH] subdev/clk: fix repeated words in comments
Posted by Karol Herbst 3 years, 7 months ago
Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>

thanks, and I'll push in a moment.

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 4:34 PM wangjianli <wangjianli@cdjrlc.com> wrote:
>
>  Delete the redundant word 'at'.
>
> Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@cdjrlc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gm20b.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gm20b.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gm20b.c
> index a139dafffe06..7c33542f651b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gm20b.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gm20b.c
> @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ gm20b_clk_prog(struct nvkm_clk *base)
>
>         /*
>          * Interim step for changing DVFS detection settings: low enough
> -        * frequency to be safe at at DVFS coeff = 0.
> +        * frequency to be safe at DVFS coeff = 0.
>          *
>          * 1. If voltage is increasing:
>          * - safe frequency target matches the lowest - old - frequency
> --
> 2.36.1
>