Makefile | 4 +-- arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c | 11 +------ arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c | 20 +----------- drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 3 ++ fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- include/linux/kexec.h | 7 ++++ kernel/kexec_file.c | 17 ++++++++++ mm/kfence/core.c | 18 +++++------ net/sched/cls_route.c | 10 ++++++ 9 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release.
There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.3-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux 5.19.3-rc1
Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature
Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
btrfs: raid56: don't trust any cached sector in __raid56_parity_recover()
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
btrfs: only write the sectors in the vertical stripe which has data stripes
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
net_sched: cls_route: disallow handle of 0
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
tee: add overflow check in register_shm_helper()
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Revert "mm: kfence: apply kmemleak_ignore_phys on early allocated pool"
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +--
arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c | 11 +------
arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c | 20 +-----------
drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 3 ++
fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
include/linux/kexec.h | 7 ++++
kernel/kexec_file.c | 17 ++++++++++
mm/kfence/core.c | 18 +++++------
net/sched/cls_route.c | 10 ++++++
9 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:39:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. > There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 150 pass: 150 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 489 pass: 489 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Guenter
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:39:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. > There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0). Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Hi Greg, On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:39:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. > There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220819): mips: 59 configs -> 1 failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> fails powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Note: csky and mips allmodconfig fails with gcc-12, passes with gcc-11. Already reported for mainline. Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1663 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1668 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk> -- Regards Sudip
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 21:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. > There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.3-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro's test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> ## Build * kernel: 5.19.3-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.19.y * git commit: 8c2c6014fe886925b313a6e8b6eb46763dafbaff * git describe: v5.19.2-8-g8c2c6014fe88 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.19.y/build/v5.19.2-8-g8c2c6014fe88 ## No test Regressions (compared to v5.19.2) ## No metric Regressions (compared to v5.19.2) ## No test Fixes (compared to v5.19.2) ## No metric Fixes (compared to v5.19.2) ## Test result summary total: 167248, pass: 149293, fail: 1211, skip: 15719, xfail: 1025 ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 314 total, 311 passed, 3 failed * arm64: 76 total, 74 passed, 2 failed * i386: 64 total, 58 passed, 6 failed * mips: 50 total, 47 passed, 3 failed * parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 65 total, 56 passed, 9 failed * riscv: 32 total, 27 passed, 5 failed * s390: 22 total, 20 passed, 2 failed * sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed * sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 69 total, 67 passed, 2 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On 8/19/22 8:39 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. > There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.3-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched). Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
On 8/19/22 9:39 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. > There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.3-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 10:54 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.3-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7
No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg
./perf bench sched all
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run
Total time: 0.734 [sec]
# Running sched/pipe benchmark...
# Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
Total time: 10.845 [sec]
10.845776 usecs/op
92201 ops/sec
Tested-by: Zan Aziz <zanaziz313@gmail.com>
Thanks
-Zan
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.