The LS1028A switch has 2 internal links to the ENETC controller.
With DSA's ability to support multiple CPU ports, we should mark both
ENETC ports as DSA masters.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
index 3da105119d82..455778936899 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
@@ -1170,6 +1170,7 @@ mscc_felix_port5: port@5 {
reg = <5>;
phy-mode = "internal";
status = "disabled";
+ ethernet = <&enetc_port3>;
fixed-link {
speed = <1000>;
--
2.34.1
Am 2022-08-18 16:05, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> The LS1028A switch has 2 internal links to the ENETC controller.
>
> With DSA's ability to support multiple CPU ports, we should mark both
> ENETC ports as DSA masters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> index 3da105119d82..455778936899 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> @@ -1170,6 +1170,7 @@ mscc_felix_port5: port@5 {
> reg = <5>;
> phy-mode = "internal";
> status = "disabled";
> + ethernet = <&enetc_port3>;
status should be the last property, no?
-michael
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 04:44:28PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > status should be the last property, no? idk, should it?
Am 2022-08-18 16:45, schrieb Vladimir Oltean: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 04:44:28PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: >> status should be the last property, no? > > idk, should it? IIRC Shawn pointed that out. If I'm mistaken, then do it for the consistency within fsl-ls1028a.dtsi :) -michael
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 05:08:57PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 2022-08-18 16:45, schrieb Vladimir Oltean: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 04:44:28PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > > > status should be the last property, no? > > > > idk, should it? > > IIRC Shawn pointed that out. If I'm mistaken, then do it for the > consistency within fsl-ls1028a.dtsi :) Yeah, I prefer to have 'status' be the last. Shawn
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.