mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: xupanda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn>
Fix a spelling mistake in comment.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: xupanda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: CGEL ZTE <cgel.zte@gmail.com>
---
Change for v2:
- fix wrong title
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index b69979c9ced5..4dddd8be320a 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ static void invalidate_reclaim_iterators(struct mem_cgroup *dead_memcg)
} while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)));
/*
- * When cgruop1 non-hierarchy mode is used,
+ * When cgroup1 non-hierarchy mode is used,
* parent_mem_cgroup() does not walk all the way up to the
* cgroup root (root_mem_cgroup). So we have to handle
* dead_memcg from cgroup root separately.
--
2.25.1
On 8/15/2022 12:21 PM, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote: > From: xupanda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn> > > Fix a spelling mistake in comment. > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> > Signed-off-by: xupanda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn> > Signed-off-by: CGEL ZTE <cgel.zte@gmail.com> > > --- > Change for v2: > - fix wrong title > --- > > mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > index b69979c9ced5..4dddd8be320a 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ static void invalidate_reclaim_iterators(struct mem_cgroup *dead_memcg) > } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg))); > > /* > - * When cgruop1 non-hierarchy mode is used, > + * When cgroup1 non-hierarchy mode is used, Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com> -Mukesh > * parent_mem_cgroup() does not walk all the way up to the > * cgroup root (root_mem_cgroup). So we have to handle > * dead_memcg from cgroup root separately.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.