From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
Doing set_cpus_allowed_ptr() with wq_unbound_cpumask can be possible
fails and trigger the false warning.
Use cpu_possible_mask instead when wq_unbound_cpumask has no active CPUs.
It is very easy to trigger the warning:
Set wq_unbound_cpumask to a small set of CPUs.
Offline all the CPUs of wq_unbound_cpumask.
Offline an extra CPU and trigger the warning.
Fixes: 10a5a651e3af("workqueue: Restrict kworker in the offline CPU pool running on housekeeping CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 355897b790a5..a429b50b06e6 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4975,7 +4975,10 @@ static void unbind_workers(int cpu)
for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, -1);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, wq_unbound_cpumask) < 0);
+ if (cpumask_intersects(wq_unbound_cpumask, cpu_active_mask))
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, wq_unbound_cpumask) < 0);
+ else
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, cpu_possible_mask) < 0);
}
mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b