Replace 'then' with 'than'.

Fixes: f4d7e40a5b71 ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)")
Signed-off-by: Kuee K1r0a <liulin063@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 0efbac0fd126..4da1a7c7657a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst_state,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	dst_state->jmp_history_cnt = src->jmp_history_cnt;
 
-	/* if dst has more stack frames then src frame, free them */
+	/* if dst has more stack frames than src frame, free them */
 	for (i = src->curframe + 1; i <= dst_state->curframe; i++) {
 		free_func_state(dst_state->frame[i]);
 		dst_state->frame[i] = NULL;
-- 
2.25.1

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 02:52:31PM +0800, Kuee K1r0a wrote:
> Replace 'then' with 'than'.
> 
> Fixes: f4d7e40a5b71 ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)")
> Signed-off-by: Kuee K1r0a <liulin063@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 0efbac0fd126..4da1a7c7657a 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst_state,
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	dst_state->jmp_history_cnt = src->jmp_history_cnt;
>  
> -	/* if dst has more stack frames then src frame, free them */
> +	/* if dst has more stack frames than src frame, free them */

Should we use plural as well, 'src frames'?

[...]

I believe the patch prefix should indicate which branch the patch targets as
well. E.g., [PATCH bpf-next]. Looks good to me otherwise.

Acked-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>