drivers/net/macsec.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
init_rx_sa() allocates relevant resource for rx_sa->stats and rx_sa->
key.tfm with alloc_percpu() and macsec_alloc_tfm(). When some error
occurs after init_rx_sa() is called in macsec_add_rxsa(), the function
released rx_sa with kfree() without releasing rx_sa->stats and rx_sa->
key.tfm, which will lead to a resource leak.
We should call macsec_rxsa_put() instead of kfree() to decrease the ref
count of rx_sa and release the relevant resource if the refcount is 0.
The same bug exists in macsec_add_txsa() for tx_sa as well. This patch
fixes the above two bugs.
Signed-off-by: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@163.com>
---
drivers/net/macsec.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/macsec.c b/drivers/net/macsec.c
index 817577e713d7..ac3ff624a8dd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/macsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/macsec.c
@@ -1842,7 +1842,7 @@ static int macsec_add_rxsa(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
return 0;
cleanup:
- kfree(rx_sa);
+ macsec_rxsa_put(rx_sa);
rtnl_unlock();
return err;
}
@@ -2085,7 +2085,7 @@ static int macsec_add_txsa(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
cleanup:
secy->operational = was_operational;
- kfree(tx_sa);
+ macsec_txsa_put(tx_sa);
rtnl_unlock();
return err;
}
--
2.25.1
On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 15:28 +0800, Jianglei Nie wrote: > init_rx_sa() allocates relevant resource for rx_sa->stats and rx_sa-> > key.tfm with alloc_percpu() and macsec_alloc_tfm(). When some error > occurs after init_rx_sa() is called in macsec_add_rxsa(), the function > released rx_sa with kfree() without releasing rx_sa->stats and rx_sa-> > key.tfm, which will lead to a resource leak. > > We should call macsec_rxsa_put() instead of kfree() to decrease the ref > count of rx_sa and release the relevant resource if the refcount is 0. > The same bug exists in macsec_add_txsa() for tx_sa as well. This patch > fixes the above two bugs. > > Signed-off-by: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@163.com> uhmmm.... this is getting weird. I already asked you 2 times to please add a suitable Fixes tag to your commit message, and this patch has been reposted unmodified... Please, read every document under Documentation/process/ carefully, and please really add the required tag next time. If the above is not clear, please ask questions, but _do not repost_ your patch unmodified, thanks! Paolo
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.