drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
When the adapter is registered without interrupts, we would be showing
the following:
# i2cdetect -l
i2c-3 i2c Broadcom STB : I2C adapter
which is visually disturbing, only add the separator if we do have an
interrupt.
Fixes: dd1aa2524bc5 ("i2c: brcmstb: Add Broadcom settop SoC i2c controller driver")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
index b00f35c0b066..538a51299e04 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
@@ -684,9 +684,11 @@ static int brcmstb_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
adap = &dev->adapter;
i2c_set_adapdata(adap, dev);
adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;
- strlcpy(adap->name, "Broadcom STB : ", sizeof(adap->name));
- if (int_name)
+ strlcpy(adap->name, "Broadcom STB", sizeof(adap->name));
+ if (int_name) {
+ strlcat(adap->name, ": ", sizeof(adap->name));
strlcat(adap->name, int_name, sizeof(adap->name));
+ }
adap->algo = &brcmstb_i2c_algo;
adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
--
2.25.1
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 10:21:15AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> When the adapter is registered without interrupts, we would be showing
> the following:
>
> # i2cdetect -l
> i2c-3 i2c Broadcom STB : I2C adapter
What about switching to pdev->name here? That way you also get the base
address for free to differentiate if there are multiple instances on the
SoC?
>
> which is visually disturbing, only add the separator if we do have an
> interrupt.
>
> Fixes: dd1aa2524bc5 ("i2c: brcmstb: Add Broadcom settop SoC i2c controller driver")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
> index b00f35c0b066..538a51299e04 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
> @@ -684,9 +684,11 @@ static int brcmstb_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> adap = &dev->adapter;
> i2c_set_adapdata(adap, dev);
> adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> - strlcpy(adap->name, "Broadcom STB : ", sizeof(adap->name));
> - if (int_name)
> + strlcpy(adap->name, "Broadcom STB", sizeof(adap->name));
> + if (int_name) {
> + strlcat(adap->name, ": ", sizeof(adap->name));
> strlcat(adap->name, int_name, sizeof(adap->name));
> + }
> adap->algo = &brcmstb_i2c_algo;
> adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
On 7/16/2022 5:40 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 10:21:15AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> When the adapter is registered without interrupts, we would be showing >> the following: >> >> # i2cdetect -l >> i2c-3 i2c Broadcom STB : I2C adapter > > What about switching to pdev->name here? That way you also get the base > address for free to differentiate if there are multiple instances on the > SoC? I was not sure if we could change the adapter name reported as one could argue this is now ABI, but if we can, then using dev_name() is probably better. You are the maintainer you so know the rules on what is considered stable ABI and what is not :) -- Florian
> I was not sure if we could change the adapter name reported as one could > argue this is now ABI, but if we can, then using dev_name() is probably > better. You are the maintainer you so know the rules on what is considered > stable ABI and what is not :) Well, then even removing ":" would break the ABI :) Please use dev_name. Other drivers changed that string, too. We never gave guarantees for that one.
On 7/18/2022 8:57 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> I was not sure if we could change the adapter name reported as one could >> argue this is now ABI, but if we can, then using dev_name() is probably >> better. You are the maintainer you so know the rules on what is considered >> stable ABI and what is not :) > > Well, then even removing ":" would break the ABI :) > > Please use dev_name. Other drivers changed that string, too. We never > gave guarantees for that one. > Fair enough, sent a v2 using dev_name(), thanks! -- Florian
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.