From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>

And also the comment said it will drop the folio references but
the code was increasing it.

Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
---
 fs/netfs/buffered_read.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
index 5b93e22397fe..a44a5b3b8d4c 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
@@ -396,9 +396,6 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
 	 */
 	ractl._nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
 	netfs_rreq_expand(rreq, &ractl);
-
-	/* We hold the folio locks, so we can drop the references */
-	folio_get(folio);
 	while (readahead_folio(&ractl))
 		;
 
-- 
2.36.0.rc1

On 7/5/22 10:22 AM, xiubli@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
>
> And also the comment said it will drop the folio references but
> the code was increasing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
> ---
>   fs/netfs/buffered_read.c | 3 ---
>   1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
> index 5b93e22397fe..a44a5b3b8d4c 100644
> --- a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
> +++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
> @@ -396,9 +396,6 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
>   	 */
>   	ractl._nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
>   	netfs_rreq_expand(rreq, &ractl);
> -
> -	/* We hold the folio locks, so we can drop the references */
> -	folio_get(folio);
>   	while (readahead_folio(&ractl))
>   		;
>   

Will drop this patch, the above fix it incorrect.

Thanks!