1. Patchew
  2. linux
  3. View series

[PATCH v2] dt-bindings: qcom: document preferred compatible naming

Krzysztof Kozlowski posted 1 patch 3 years, 9 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml     | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
[PATCH v2] dt-bindings: qcom: document preferred compatible naming
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 3 years, 9 months ago 
Compatibles can come in two formats.  Either "vendor,ip-soc" or
"vendor,soc-ip".  Qualcomm bindings were mixing both of usages, so add a
DT schema file documenting preferred policy and enforcing it for all new
compatibles, except few existing patterns.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

---

Changes since v1:
1. Add schema instead of readme (Rob).

Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml     | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1af1f16c13ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/qcom-soc.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Qualcomm SoC compatibles naming convention
+
+maintainers:
+  - Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
+
+description: |
+  Guidelines for new compatibles for SoC blocks/components.
+  When adding new compatibles in new bindings, use the format::
+    qcom,SoC-IP
+
+  For example::
+   qcom,sdm845-llcc-bwmon
+
+  When adding new compatibles to existing bindings, use the format in the
+  existing binding, even if it contradicts the above.
+
+select:
+  properties:
+    compatible:
+      pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$"
+  required:
+    - compatible
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    oneOf:
+      - description: Preferred naming style for compatibles of SoC components
+        pattern: "^qcom,(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$"
+
+      # Legacy namings - variations of existing patterns/compatibles are OK,
+      # but do not add completely new entries to these:
+      - pattern: "^qcom,gcc-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$"
+      - pattern: "^qcom,mmcc-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$"
+      - pattern: "^qcom,pcie-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$"
+      - pattern: "^qcom,rpm-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$"
+      - pattern: "^qcom,scm-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$"
+      - enum:
+          - qcom,gpucc-sdm630
+          - qcom,gpucc-sdm660
+          - qcom,lcc-apq8064
+          - qcom,lcc-ipq8064
+          - qcom,lcc-mdm9615
+          - qcom,lcc-msm8960
+          - qcom,lpass-cpu-apq8016
+          - qcom,usb-ss-ipq4019-phy
+          - qcom,usb-hs-ipq4019-phy
+          - qcom,vqmmc-ipq4019-regulator
+
+additionalProperties: true
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: qcom: document preferred compatible naming
Posted by Rob Herring 3 years, 9 months ago 
On Mon, 04 Jul 2022 12:18:23 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Compatibles can come in two formats.  Either "vendor,ip-soc" or
> "vendor,soc-ip".  Qualcomm bindings were mixing both of usages, so add a
> DT schema file documenting preferred policy and enforcing it for all new
> compatibles, except few existing patterns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Add schema instead of readme (Rob).
> 
> Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
> Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
> Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml     | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> 

My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/qcom-wdt.example.dtb: watchdog@208a038: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' does not match '^qcom,(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$'
	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' does not match '^qcom,gcc-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$'
	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' does not match '^qcom,mmcc-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$'
	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' does not match '^qcom,pcie-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$'
	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' does not match '^qcom,rpm-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$'
	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' does not match '^qcom,scm-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$'
	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' is not one of ['qcom,gpucc-sdm630', 'qcom,gpucc-sdm660', 'qcom,lcc-apq8064', 'qcom,lcc-ipq8064', 'qcom,lcc-mdm9615', 'qcom,lcc-msm8960', 'qcom,lpass-cpu-apq8016', 'qcom,usb-ss-ipq4019-phy', 'qcom,usb-hs-ipq4019-phy', 'qcom,vqmmc-ipq4019-regulator']
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml

doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/

This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
series is generally the most recent rc1.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit.
Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: qcom: document preferred compatible naming
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 3 years, 9 months ago 
On 05/07/2022 02:50, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jul 2022 12:18:23 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Compatibles can come in two formats.  Either "vendor,ip-soc" or
>> "vendor,soc-ip".  Qualcomm bindings were mixing both of usages, so add a
>> DT schema file documenting preferred policy and enforcing it for all new
>> compatibles, except few existing patterns.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> 1. Add schema instead of readme (Rob).
>>
>> Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml     | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
>>
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/qcom-wdt.example.dtb: watchdog@208a038: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> 	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' does not match '^qcom,(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$'
> 	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' does not match '^qcom,gcc-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$'
> 	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' does not match '^qcom,mmcc-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$'
> 	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' does not match '^qcom,pcie-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$'
> 	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' does not match '^qcom,rpm-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$'
> 	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' does not match '^qcom,scm-(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$'
> 	'qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064' is not one of ['qcom,gpucc-sdm630', 'qcom,gpucc-sdm660', 'qcom,lcc-apq8064', 'qcom,lcc-ipq8064', 'qcom,lcc-mdm9615', 'qcom,lcc-msm8960', 'qcom,lpass-cpu-apq8016', 'qcom,usb-ss-ipq4019-phy', 'qcom,usb-hs-ipq4019-phy', 'qcom,vqmmc-ipq4019-regulator']
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml


I'll fix it.


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: qcom: document preferred compatible naming
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 3 years, 9 months ago 
On 04/07/2022 12:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Compatibles can come in two formats.  Either "vendor,ip-soc" or
> "vendor,soc-ip".  Qualcomm bindings were mixing both of usages, so add a
> DT schema file documenting preferred policy and enforcing it for all new
> compatibles, except few existing patterns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Add schema instead of readme (Rob).
> 
> Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
> Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
> Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml     | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1af1f16c13ab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/qcom-soc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Qualcomm SoC compatibles naming convention
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> +
> +description: |
> +  Guidelines for new compatibles for SoC blocks/components.
> +  When adding new compatibles in new bindings, use the format::
> +    qcom,SoC-IP
> +
> +  For example::
> +   qcom,sdm845-llcc-bwmon
> +
> +  When adding new compatibles to existing bindings, use the format in the
> +  existing binding, even if it contradicts the above.
> +
> +select:
> +  properties:
> +    compatible:
> +      pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$"
> +  required:
> +    - compatible
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - description: Preferred naming style for compatibles of SoC components
> +        pattern: "^qcom,(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$"

This pattern should be stricter - followed by '-':
"^qcom,(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+-.*$"

and additional pattern added for a variant (or maybe few):
"^qcom,msm[0-9]+pro-.*$"

This way also compatibles like "qcom,sdm630whatever" will be caught.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Patchew 2.1-devel-ea86937

© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.