In the past it had a problem not setting the pid/tid on the sample
correctly when system-wide mode is used.  Although it's fixed now it'd
be nice if we have a test case for it.

Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
* skip if system-wide record was failed
* use dummy event for testing

 tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh
index e59044edc406..0d47479adba8 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh
@@ -23,17 +23,20 @@ glb_err=0
 cleanup_files()
 {
 	rm -f ${perfdata}
+	rm -f ${perfdata}.old
 	exit $glb_err
 }
 
 trap cleanup_files exit term int
 
 arm_spe_report() {
-	if [ $2 != 0 ]; then
+	if [ $2 = 0 ]; then
+		echo "$1: PASS"
+	elif [ $2 = 2 ]; then
+		echo "$1: SKIPPED"
+	else
 		echo "$1: FAIL"
 		glb_err=$2
-	else
-		echo "$1: PASS"
 	fi
 }
 
@@ -85,5 +88,26 @@ arm_spe_snapshot_test() {
 	arm_spe_report "SPE snapshot testing" $err
 }
 
+arm_spe_system_wide_test() {
+	echo "Recording trace with system-wide mode $perfdata"
+
+	perf record -o - -e dummy -a -B true > /dev/null 2>&1
+	if [ $? != 0 ]; then
+		arm_spe_report "SPE system-wide testing" 2
+		return
+	fi
+
+	perf record -o ${perfdata} -e arm_spe// -a --no-bpf-event \
+		-- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null count=100000 > /dev/null 2>&1
+
+	perf_script_samples dd &&
+	perf_report_samples dd
+
+	err=$?
+	arm_spe_report "SPE system-wide testing" $err
+}
+
 arm_spe_snapshot_test
+arm_spe_system_wide_test
+
 exit $glb_err
-- 
2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog

On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 04:09:32PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> In the past it had a problem not setting the pid/tid on the sample
> correctly when system-wide mode is used.  Although it's fixed now it'd
> be nice if we have a test case for it.
> 
> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

Tested for both root user and non-privileged user, both works as
expected:

Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>

Em Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 11:13:52AM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 04:09:32PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > In the past it had a problem not setting the pid/tid on the sample
> > correctly when system-wide mode is used.  Although it's fixed now it'd
> > be nice if we have a test case for it.
> > 
> > Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
> > Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> 
> Tested for both root user and non-privileged user, both works as
> expected:
> 
> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

On 02/07/2022 00:09, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> In the past it had a problem not setting the pid/tid on the sample
> correctly when system-wide mode is used.  Although it's fixed now it'd
> be nice if we have a test case for it.
>
> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>

> ---
> * skip if system-wide record was failed
> * use dummy event for testing

Thanks,
German