This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release.
There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.128-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.10.128-rc1

Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
    net: mscc: ocelot: allow unregistered IP multicast flooding

Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
    powerpc/ftrace: Remove ftrace init tramp once kernel init is complete

Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
    xfs: check sb_meta_uuid for dabuf buffer recovery

Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
    xfs: remove all COW fork extents when remounting readonly

Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
    xfs: Fix the free logic of state in xfs_attr_node_hasname

Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
    xfs: punch out data fork delalloc blocks on COW writeback failure

Rustam Kovhaev <rkovhaev@gmail.com>
    xfs: use kmem_cache_free() for kmem_cache objects

Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
    bcache: memset on stack variables in bch_btree_check() and bch_sectors_dirty_init()

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    clocksource/drivers/ixp4xx: remove __init from ixp4xx_timer_setup()

Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
    tick/nohz: unexport __init-annotated tick_nohz_full_setup()

Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
    drm: remove drm_fb_helper_modinit

Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
    MAINTAINERS: add Amir as xfs maintainer for 5.10.y


-------------

Diffstat:

 MAINTAINERS                                |  3 ++-
 Makefile                                   |  4 ++--
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h          |  4 +++-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c         | 15 ++++++++++++---
 arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c                      |  2 ++
 drivers/clocksource/mmio.c                 |  2 +-
 drivers/clocksource/timer-ixp4xx.c         | 10 ++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper_internal.h | 10 ----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c            | 21 ---------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_kms_helper_common.c    | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 drivers/md/bcache/btree.c                  |  1 +
 drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c              |  1 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c         |  8 ++++++--
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c                   | 13 +++++--------
 fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c                          | 15 ++++++++++++---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item_recover.c              |  2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c                  |  6 +++---
 fs/xfs/xfs_super.c                         | 14 +++++++++++---
 include/linux/platform_data/timer-ixp4xx.h |  5 ++---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c                   |  1 -
 20 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release.
> There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:05PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release.
> There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220627):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1429
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1436


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 19:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release.
> There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.128-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 929b4759e471d567a6993b953bb85c5bb9f8fa7e
* git describe: v5.10.127-13-g929b4759e471
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.127-13-g929b4759e471

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.127)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.127)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.127)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.127)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 127248, pass: 114167, fail: 259, skip: 12135, xfail: 687

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 308 total, 308 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 62 total, 62 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 48 total, 48 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 51 total, 51 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 56 total, 55 passed, 1 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

On 2022/6/30 21:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release.
> There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.128-rc1,

Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Version: 5.10.128-rc1
Commit: 929b4759e471d567a6993b953bb85c5bb9f8fa7e
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)

arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9093
passed: 9093
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9093
passed: 9093
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:05PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release.
> There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 163 pass: 163 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

On 6/30/22 7:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release.
> There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

On 6/30/2022 6:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release.
> There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian