Makefile | 4 +-- arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h | 4 ++- arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 15 ++++++++-- arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 2 ++ drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/clocksource/timer-ixp4xx.c | 25 ----------------- drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 1 + drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c | 4 +-- fs/io_uring.c | 34 ++++++++++++----------- include/linux/platform_data/timer-ixp4xx.h | 11 -------- kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 1 - 12 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux 5.18.9-rc1
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
io_uring: fix not locked access to fixed buf table
Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
powerpc/ftrace: Remove ftrace init tramp once kernel init is complete
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
hinic: Replace memcpy() with direct assignment
Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
bcache: memset on stack variables in bch_btree_check() and bch_sectors_dirty_init()
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
clocksource/drivers/ixp4xx: Drop boardfile probe path
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
tick/nohz: unexport __init-annotated tick_nohz_full_setup()
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +--
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h | 4 ++-
arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 15 ++++++++--
arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 2 ++
drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/clocksource/timer-ixp4xx.c | 25 -----------------
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 1 +
drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 1 +
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c | 4 +--
fs/io_uring.c | 34 ++++++++++++-----------
include/linux/platform_data/timer-ixp4xx.h | 11 --------
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 1 -
12 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted. Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Hi Greg, resend: 5.18.9-rc1 tested. Run tested on: - Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7) In addition - build tested for: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - Allwinner H6 - NXP iMX6 - NXP iMX8 - Qualcomm Dragonboard - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro - Samsung Exynos Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com> -- Rudi
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Hi Greg, 5.18.8-rc1 tested. Run tested on: - Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7) In addition - build tested for: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - Allwinner H6 - NXP iMX6 - NXP iMX8 - Qualcomm Dragonboard - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro - Samsung Exynos Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com> -- Rudi
Hi Greg, On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.1.1 20220627): mips: 59 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1431 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1438 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1440 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk> -- Regards Sudip
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0)
and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
I get a warning on cifs:
CC [M] fs/cifs/connect.o
CC drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o
CC drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o
fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote':
fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable]
3426 | bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS;
| ^~~~~
The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call
cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit
421ef3d56513b2).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 02:59:10PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
>
> Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0)
> and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
>
> I get a warning on cifs:
>
> CC [M] fs/cifs/connect.o
> CC drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o
> CC drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o
> fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote':
> fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable]
> 3426 | bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS;
> | ^~~~~
>
> The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call
> cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit
> 421ef3d56513b2).
Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until
Linus's tree is fixed up entirely. Once that happens, then I will take
backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
But until then, no need to report anything here, as there's nothing I
can do.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 10:24:10AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 02:59:10PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> > > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> >
> > Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0)
> > and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
> >
> > I get a warning on cifs:
> >
> > CC [M] fs/cifs/connect.o
> > CC drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o
> > CC drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o
> > fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote':
> > fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable]
> > 3426 | bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS;
> > | ^~~~~
> >
> > The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call
> > cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit
> > 421ef3d56513b2).
>
> Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until
> Linus's tree is fixed up entirely. Once that happens, then I will take
> backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
I have not tested, but this should be fixed by this one:
93ed91c020aa ("cifs: fix minor compile warning")
--
Regards
Sudip
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 11:31:27AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 10:24:10AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 02:59:10PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> > > > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0)
> > > and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
> > >
> > > I get a warning on cifs:
> > >
> > > CC [M] fs/cifs/connect.o
> > > CC drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o
> > > CC drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o
> > > fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote':
> > > fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable]
> > > 3426 | bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS;
> > > | ^~~~~
> > >
> > > The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call
> > > cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit
> > > 421ef3d56513b2).
> >
> > Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until
> > Linus's tree is fixed up entirely. Once that happens, then I will take
> > backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
>
> I have not tested, but this should be fixed by this one:
>
> 93ed91c020aa ("cifs: fix minor compile warning")
Thanks, now queued up.
greg k-h
On 7/1/22 15:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until > Linus's tree is fixed up entirely. Once that happens, then I will take > backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly. > OK. I also tried building the mainline (with ppc64_defconfig), no warnings reported. Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 19:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> ## Build * kernel: 5.18.9-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.18.y * git commit: 2c9a64b3a872fb2818d217509b16e61ba54c365e * git describe: v5.18.8-7-g2c9a64b3a872 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.18.y/build/v5.18.8-7-g2c9a64b3a872 ## Test Regressions (compared to v5.18.8) No test regressions found. ## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.18.8) No metric regressions found. ## Test Fixes (compared to v5.18.8) No test fixes found. ## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.18.8) No metric fixes found. ## Test result summary total: 120950, pass: 109794, fail: 546, skip: 9999, xfail: 611 ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 307 total, 307 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 62 total, 62 passed, 0 failed * i386: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed * mips: 48 total, 48 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 60 total, 54 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 27 total, 22 passed, 5 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 56 total, 54 passed, 2 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On 6/30/22 6:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched). Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 489 pass: 489 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Guenter
On 6/30/2022 6:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels: Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> -- Florian
On 6/30/22 7:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 9:17 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7
No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg
./perf bench sched all
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run
Total time: 0.427 [sec]
# Running sched/pipe benchmark...
# Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
Total time: 10.046 [sec]
10.046035 usecs/op
99541 ops/sec
Tested-by: Zan Aziz <zanaziz313@gmail.com>
Thanks
-Zan
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.