[PATCH] exec: Fix a spelling mistake

Zhang Jiaming posted 1 patch 3 years, 10 months ago
fs/exec.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] exec: Fix a spelling mistake
Posted by Zhang Jiaming 3 years, 10 months ago
Change 'wont't' to 'won't'.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Jiaming <jiaming@nfschina.com>
---
 fs/exec.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 96b9847fca99..5f0656e10b5d 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		/*
 		 * We are going to release_task()->ptrace_unlink() silently,
 		 * the tracer can sleep in do_wait(). EXIT_DEAD guarantees
-		 * the tracer wont't block again waiting for this thread.
+		 * the tracer won't block again waiting for this thread.
 		 */
 		if (unlikely(leader->ptrace))
 			__wake_up_parent(leader, leader->parent);
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH] exec: Fix a spelling mistake
Posted by Kees Cook 3 years, 9 months ago
On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:29:32 +0800, Zhang Jiaming wrote:
> Change 'wont't' to 'won't'.

Applied to for-next/execve, thanks!

[1/1] exec: Fix a spelling mistake
      https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/5036793d7dbd

-- 
Kees Cook
Re: [PATCH] exec: Fix a spelling mistake
Posted by Souptick Joarder 3 years, 10 months ago
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 1:07 PM Zhang Jiaming <jiaming@nfschina.com> wrote:
>
> Change 'wont't' to 'won't'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Jiaming <jiaming@nfschina.com>

Reviewed-by: Souptick Joarder (HPE) <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/exec.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> index 96b9847fca99..5f0656e10b5d 100644
> --- a/fs/exec.c
> +++ b/fs/exec.c
> @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
>                 /*
>                  * We are going to release_task()->ptrace_unlink() silently,
>                  * the tracer can sleep in do_wait(). EXIT_DEAD guarantees
> -                * the tracer wont't block again waiting for this thread.
> +                * the tracer won't block again waiting for this thread.
>                  */
>                 if (unlikely(leader->ptrace))
>                         __wake_up_parent(leader, leader->parent);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>