[PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.201-rc1 review

Greg Kroah-Hartman posted 11 patches 3 years, 10 months ago
Documentation/hwmon/hwmon-kernel-api.rst |  2 +-
Makefile                                 |  4 +-
arch/arm64/mm/cache.S                    |  2 -
arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c                   |  2 +-
drivers/hwmon/hwmon.c                    | 16 ++++---
drivers/md/dm-table.c                    | 32 +-------------
drivers/md/dm.c                          | 73 +++-----------------------------
drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c    | 11 ++++-
include/linux/device-mapper.h            |  1 -
net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c               | 31 ++++++++++----
10 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
[PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.201-rc1 review
Posted by Greg Kroah-Hartman 3 years, 10 months ago
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.201 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.201-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.4.201-rc1

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "hwmon: Make chip parameter for with_info API mandatory"

Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
    arm64: mm: Don't invalidate FROM_DEVICE buffers at start of DMA transfer

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
    tcp: drop the hash_32() part from the index calculation

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
    tcp: increase source port perturb table to 2^16

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
    tcp: dynamically allocate the perturb table used by source ports

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
    tcp: add small random increments to the source port

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
    tcp: use different parts of the port_offset for index and offset

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
    tcp: add some entropy in __inet_hash_connect()

Marian Postevca <posteuca@mutex.one>
    usb: gadget: u_ether: fix regression in setting fixed MAC address

Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
    dm: remove special-casing of bio-based immutable singleton target on NVMe

Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
    s390/mm: use non-quiescing sske for KVM switch to keyed guest


-------------

Diffstat:

 Documentation/hwmon/hwmon-kernel-api.rst |  2 +-
 Makefile                                 |  4 +-
 arch/arm64/mm/cache.S                    |  2 -
 arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c                   |  2 +-
 drivers/hwmon/hwmon.c                    | 16 ++++---
 drivers/md/dm-table.c                    | 32 +-------------
 drivers/md/dm.c                          | 73 +++-----------------------------
 drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c    | 11 ++++-
 include/linux/device-mapper.h            |  1 -
 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c               | 31 ++++++++++----
 10 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.201-rc1 review
Posted by Naresh Kamboju 3 years, 9 months ago
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 22:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.201 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.201-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.4.201-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: efc2c248e27628cb56d6643c2f1d2c32f5864c12
* git describe: v5.4.199-252-gefc2c248e276
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.199-252-gefc2c248e276

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.199-241-gbc956dd0d885)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.199-241-gbc956dd0d885)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.199-241-gbc956dd0d885)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.199-241-gbc956dd0d885)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 121268, pass: 108045, fail: 397, skip: 11943, xfail: 883

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 313 total, 313 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 57 total, 53 passed, 4 failed
* i386: 28 total, 25 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 54 total, 54 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 55 total, 54 passed, 1 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.201-rc1 review
Posted by Guenter Roeck 3 years, 9 months ago
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:45:04PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.201 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 449 pass: 449 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.201-rc1 review
Posted by Sudip Mukherjee 3 years, 9 months ago
Hi Greg,

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:45:04PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.201 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220621):
mips: 65 configs -> no failure
arm: 106 configs -> no failure
arm64: 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure


Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1384


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.201-rc1 review
Posted by Samuel Zou 3 years, 9 months ago

On 2022/6/24 0:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.201 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.201-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.4.201-rc1,

Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.4.y
Version: 5.4.201-rc1
Commit: efc2c248e27628cb56d6643c2f1d2c32f5864c12
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)

arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9086
passed: 9086
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9086
passed: 9086
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.201-rc1 review
Posted by Shuah Khan 3 years, 9 months ago
On 6/23/22 10:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.201 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.201-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.201-rc1 review
Posted by Florian Fainelli 3 years, 10 months ago
On 6/23/22 09:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.201 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.201-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian