there is an unexpected word "the" in the comments that need to be dropped

file: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
line: 86
*    means the the unique name for the master node just opening is _not_ filled
changed to
*    means the unique name for the master node just opening is _not_ filled

Signed-off-by: Jiang Jian <jiangjian@cdjrlc.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
index 51fcf1298023..8faad23dc1d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
  *
  * 1. Directly call VERSION to get the version and to match against the driver
  *    name returned by that ioctl. Note that SET_VERSION is not called, which
- *    means the the unique name for the master node just opening is _not_ filled
+ *    means the unique name for the master node just opening is _not_ filled
  *    out. This despite that with current drm device nodes are always bound to
  *    one device, and can't be runtime assigned like with drm 1.0.
  * 2. Match driver name. If it mismatches, proceed to the next device node.
-- 
2.17.1

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 21:51:40 +0800, Jiang Jian wrote:
> there is an unexpected word "the" in the comments that need to be dropped
> 
> file: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> line: 86
> *    means the the unique name for the master node just opening is _not_ filled
> changed to
> *    means the unique name for the master node just opening is _not_ filled
> 
> [...]

Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).

Thanks!
Maxime