[PATCH] mips: mti-malta: Fix refcount leak in malta-time.c

Liang He posted 1 patch 3 years, 10 months ago
arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-time.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
[PATCH] mips: mti-malta: Fix refcount leak in malta-time.c
Posted by Liang He 3 years, 10 months ago
In update_gic_frequency_dt(), of_find_compatible_node() will return
a node pointer with refcount incremented. We should use of_node_put()
when it is not used anymore.

Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@126.com>
---
 arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-time.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-time.c b/arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-time.c
index bbf1e38e1431..2cb708cdf01a 100644
--- a/arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-time.c
+++ b/arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-time.c
@@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ static void update_gic_frequency_dt(void)
 
 	if (of_update_property(node, &gic_frequency_prop) < 0)
 		pr_err("error updating gic frequency property\n");
+
+	of_node_put(node);
 }
 
 #endif
-- 
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH] mips: mti-malta: Fix refcount leak in malta-time.c
Posted by Thomas Bogendoerfer 3 years, 10 months ago
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:27:56PM +0800, Liang He wrote:
> In update_gic_frequency_dt(), of_find_compatible_node() will return
> a node pointer with refcount incremented. We should use of_node_put()
> when it is not used anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@126.com>
> ---
>  arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-time.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-time.c b/arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-time.c
> index bbf1e38e1431..2cb708cdf01a 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-time.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-time.c
> @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ static void update_gic_frequency_dt(void)
>  
>  	if (of_update_property(node, &gic_frequency_prop) < 0)
>  		pr_err("error updating gic frequency property\n");
> +
> +	of_node_put(node);
>  }
>  
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.25.1

applied to mips-fixes.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]