drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Replace the 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' which is more accurate.
Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@cdjrlc.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c
index 3977a0f9d132..d6977e4e71f3 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c
@@ -35,9 +35,9 @@
struct atmel_tcb_pwm_device {
enum pwm_polarity polarity; /* PWM polarity */
- unsigned div; /* PWM clock divider */
- unsigned duty; /* PWM duty expressed in clk cycles */
- unsigned period; /* PWM period expressed in clk cycles */
+ unsigned int div; /* PWM clock divider */
+ unsigned int duty; /* PWM duty expressed in clk cycles */
+ unsigned int period; /* PWM period expressed in clk cycles */
};
struct atmel_tcb_channel {
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip,
{
struct atmel_tcb_pwm_chip *tcbpwmc = to_tcb_chip(chip);
struct atmel_tcb_pwm_device *tcbpwm;
- unsigned cmr;
+ unsigned int cmr;
int ret;
tcbpwm = devm_kzalloc(chip->dev, sizeof(*tcbpwm), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void atmel_tcb_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
{
struct atmel_tcb_pwm_chip *tcbpwmc = to_tcb_chip(chip);
struct atmel_tcb_pwm_device *tcbpwm = tcbpwmc->pwms[pwm->hwpwm];
- unsigned cmr;
+ unsigned int cmr;
enum pwm_polarity polarity = tcbpwm->polarity;
/*
@@ -295,9 +295,9 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
struct atmel_tcb_pwm_device *atcbpwm = NULL;
int i = 0;
int slowclk = 0;
- unsigned period;
- unsigned duty;
- unsigned rate = clk_get_rate(tcbpwmc->clk);
+ unsigned int period;
+ unsigned int duty;
+ unsigned int rate = clk_get_rate(tcbpwmc->clk);
unsigned long long min;
unsigned long long max;
--
2.36.1
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 09:06:07AM +0800, Jilin Yuan wrote:
> Replace the 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' which is more accurate.
What was your motivation? To please checkpatch? Please mention this in
the commit log.
> Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@cdjrlc.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c
> index 3977a0f9d132..d6977e4e71f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c
> @@ -35,9 +35,9 @@
>
> struct atmel_tcb_pwm_device {
> enum pwm_polarity polarity; /* PWM polarity */
> - unsigned div; /* PWM clock divider */
> - unsigned duty; /* PWM duty expressed in clk cycles */
> - unsigned period; /* PWM period expressed in clk cycles */
> + unsigned int div; /* PWM clock divider */
> + unsigned int duty; /* PWM duty expressed in clk cycles */
> + unsigned int period; /* PWM period expressed in clk cycles */
Please reindent the comments such they keep to be aligned.
> };
>
> struct atmel_tcb_channel {
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.