kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The check is required iff HRTICK is enabled and DOUBLE_TICK is disabled,
avoid the redundant check by adding corresponding sched_feat() .
Signed-off-by: Huichun Feng <foxhoundsk.tw@gmail.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 77b2048a9..80cc1a924 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4668,7 +4668,7 @@ entity_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr, int queued)
/*
* don't let the period tick interfere with the hrtick preemption
*/
- if (!sched_feat(DOUBLE_TICK) &&
+ if (sched_feat(HRTICK) && !sched_feat(DOUBLE_TICK) &&
hrtimer_active(&rq_of(cfs_rq)->hrtick_timer))
return;
#endif
--
2.36.1
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 08:26:12PM +0800, Huichun Feng wrote: > The check is required iff HRTICK is enabled and DOUBLE_TICK is disabled, > avoid the redundant check by adding corresponding sched_feat() . How about: 'don't do that then'?
The check is required iff HRTICK is enabled and DOUBLE_TICK is disabled,
don't do that then.
Signed-off-by: Huichun Feng <foxhoundsk.tw@gmail.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Refine commit message
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 77b2048a9..80cc1a924 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4668,7 +4668,7 @@ entity_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr, int queued)
/*
* don't let the period tick interfere with the hrtick preemption
*/
- if (!sched_feat(DOUBLE_TICK) &&
+ if (sched_feat(HRTICK) && !sched_feat(DOUBLE_TICK) &&
hrtimer_active(&rq_of(cfs_rq)->hrtick_timer))
return;
#endif
--
2.36.1
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> 於 2022年6月9日 週四 下午8:29寫道: > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 08:26:12PM +0800, Huichun Feng wrote: > > The check is required iff HRTICK is enabled and DOUBLE_TICK is disabled, > > avoid the redundant check by adding corresponding sched_feat() . > > How about: 'don't do that then'? Looks good! Should I send a v2 for this? Or could you help amend it directly? Thank you! Huichun
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.