arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ulz-bsh-smm-m2.dts | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
From: Simon Holesch <simon.holesch@bshg.com>
Supports initiating poweroff on SNVS_PMIC_ON_REQ signal.
Signed-off-by: Simon Holesch <simon.holesch@bshg.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ulz-bsh-smm-m2.dts | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ulz-bsh-smm-m2.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ulz-bsh-smm-m2.dts
index 59bcfc9a6b10..c92e4e2f6ab9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ulz-bsh-smm-m2.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ulz-bsh-smm-m2.dts
@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ &gpmi {
status = "okay";
};
+&snvs_poweroff {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
&uart3 {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_uart3>;
--
2.25.1
Hi Michael, On 17/05/2022 10:35, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > From: Simon Holesch <simon.holesch@bshg.com> > > Supports initiating poweroff on SNVS_PMIC_ON_REQ signal. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Holesch <simon.holesch@bshg.com> You missed your own Signed-off-by tag here.
Hi Fabio On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 3:41 PM Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On 17/05/2022 10:35, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > > From: Simon Holesch <simon.holesch@bshg.com> > > > > Supports initiating poweroff on SNVS_PMIC_ON_REQ signal. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Holesch <simon.holesch@bshg.com> > > You missed your own Signed-off-by tag here. It's fine, I can add Tested-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com> Michael -- Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer M. +39 347 913 2170 michael@amarulasolutions.com __________________________________ Amarula Solutions BV Joop Geesinkweg 125, 1114 AB, Amsterdam, NL T. +31 (0)85 111 9172 info@amarulasolutions.com www.amarulasolutions.com
Hi Michael, On 17/05/2022 10:44, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: >> You missed your own Signed-off-by tag here. > > It's fine, I can add Tested-by: Michael Trimarchi > <michael@amarulasolutions.com> If you are transmitting someone else's patch, then you need to add your own Signed-off-by to it. This is explained in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst: "Any further SoBs (Signed-off-by:'s) following the author's SoB are from people handling and transporting the patch, but were not involved in its development. SoB chains should reflect the **real** route a patch took as it was propagated to the maintainers and ultimately to Linus, with the first SoB entry signalling primary authorship of a single author."
Hi On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 3:50 PM Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On 17/05/2022 10:44, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > > >> You missed your own Signed-off-by tag here. > > > > It's fine, I can add Tested-by: Michael Trimarchi > > <michael@amarulasolutions.com> > > If you are transmitting someone else's patch, then you need to add > your own Signed-off-by to it. > > This is explained in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst: > > "Any further SoBs (Signed-off-by:'s) following the author's SoB are from > people handling and transporting the patch, but were not involved in its > development. SoB chains should reflect the **real** route a patch took > as it was propagated to the maintainers and ultimately to Linus, with > the first SoB entry signalling primary authorship of a single author." Done, thank you Michael -- Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer M. +39 347 913 2170 michael@amarulasolutions.com __________________________________ Amarula Solutions BV Joop Geesinkweg 125, 1114 AB, Amsterdam, NL T. +31 (0)85 111 9172 info@amarulasolutions.com www.amarulasolutions.com
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.