of_find_node_by_name() returns a node pointer with refcount
incremented, we should use of_node_put() on it when done.
Add missing of_node_put() to avoid refcount leak.

Fixes: 0fbeae70ee7c ("regulator: add SCMI driver")
Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c
index 1f02f60ad136..41ae7ac27ff6 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int scmi_regulator_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
 			return ret;
 		}
 	}
-
+	of_node_put(np);
 	/*
 	 * Register a regulator for each valid regulator-DT-entry that we
 	 * can successfully reach via SCMI and has a valid associated voltage
-- 
2.25.1

On Mon, 16 May 2022 11:44:33 +0400, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
> of_find_node_by_name() returns a node pointer with refcount
> incremented, we should use of_node_put() on it when done.
> Add missing of_node_put() to avoid refcount leak.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: scmi: Fix refcount leak in scmi_regulator_probe
      commit: 68d6c8476fd4f448e70e0ab31ff972838ac41dae

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark