[PATCH 5.10 00/10] 5.10.116-rc1 review

Greg Kroah-Hartman posted 10 patches 3 years, 12 months ago
Documentation/vm/memory-model.rst                  |  3 +--
Makefile                                           |  4 +--
arch/arm/Kconfig                                   |  8 ++----
arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig                          |  1 -
arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig                      |  1 -
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig                       |  1 -
arch/arm/mach-highbank/Kconfig                     |  1 -
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig                        |  1 -
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig                      |  1 -
arch/arm/mach-tango/Kconfig                        |  1 -
arch/mips/bmips/setup.c                            |  2 +-
arch/mips/lantiq/prom.c                            |  2 +-
arch/mips/pic32/pic32mzda/init.c                   |  2 +-
arch/mips/ralink/of.c                              |  2 +-
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c                       | 13 +++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/gpio/gpio_service.c | 12 ++++-----
.../amd/display/include/gpio_service_interface.h   |  4 +--
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_asm.c       |  4 +--
fs/proc/kcore.c                                    |  2 --
include/linux/mmzone.h                             | 31 ----------------------
include/linux/regulator/consumer.h                 | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++
include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h                   |  3 +++
mm/memory.c                                        |  2 ++
mm/migrate.c                                       |  7 +++--
mm/mmzone.c                                        | 14 ----------
mm/userfaultfd.c                                   |  3 +++
mm/vmstat.c                                        |  4 ---
net/bluetooth/hci_core.c                           |  6 ++---
28 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
[PATCH 5.10 00/10] 5.10.116-rc1 review
Posted by Greg Kroah-Hartman 3 years, 12 months ago
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.116 release.
There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.116-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.10.116-rc1

Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
    mm: userfaultfd: fix missing cache flush in mcopy_atomic_pte() and __mcopy_atomic()

Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
    mm: hugetlb: fix missing cache flush in copy_huge_page_from_user()

Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
    mm: fix missing cache flush for all tail pages of compound page

Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
    Bluetooth: Fix the creation of hdev->name

Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
    arm: remove CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL

Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
    nfp: bpf: silence bitwise vs. logical OR warning

Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
    drm/amd/display/dc/gpio/gpio_service: Pass around correct dce_{version, environment} types

Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
    block: drbd: drbd_nl: Make conversion to 'enum drbd_ret_code' explicit

Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
    regulator: consumer: Add missing stubs to regulator/consumer.h

Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
    MIPS: Use address-of operator on section symbols


-------------

Diffstat:

 Documentation/vm/memory-model.rst                  |  3 +--
 Makefile                                           |  4 +--
 arch/arm/Kconfig                                   |  8 ++----
 arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig                          |  1 -
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig                      |  1 -
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig                       |  1 -
 arch/arm/mach-highbank/Kconfig                     |  1 -
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig                        |  1 -
 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig                      |  1 -
 arch/arm/mach-tango/Kconfig                        |  1 -
 arch/mips/bmips/setup.c                            |  2 +-
 arch/mips/lantiq/prom.c                            |  2 +-
 arch/mips/pic32/pic32mzda/init.c                   |  2 +-
 arch/mips/ralink/of.c                              |  2 +-
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c                       | 13 +++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/gpio/gpio_service.c | 12 ++++-----
 .../amd/display/include/gpio_service_interface.h   |  4 +--
 drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_asm.c       |  4 +--
 fs/proc/kcore.c                                    |  2 --
 include/linux/mmzone.h                             | 31 ----------------------
 include/linux/regulator/consumer.h                 | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h                   |  3 +++
 mm/memory.c                                        |  2 ++
 mm/migrate.c                                       |  7 +++--
 mm/mmzone.c                                        | 14 ----------
 mm/userfaultfd.c                                   |  3 +++
 mm/vmstat.c                                        |  4 ---
 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c                           |  6 ++---
 28 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/10] 5.10.116-rc1 review
Posted by Guenter Roeck 3 years, 12 months ago
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 04:23:44PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.116 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/10] 5.10.116-rc1 review
Posted by Sudip Mukherjee 3 years, 12 months ago
Hi Greg,

On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 04:23:44PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.116 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 63 configs -> no failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1139
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1144


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/10] 5.10.116-rc1 review
Posted by Naresh Kamboju 3 years, 12 months ago
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 19:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.116 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.116-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.116-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: b770d46f20165770243c4893df110518daee01fc
* git describe: v5.10.115-11-gb770d46f2016
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.115-11-gb770d46f2016

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.114-71-gb2286cf7a697)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.114-71-gb2286cf7a697)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.114-71-gb2286cf7a697)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.114-71-gb2286cf7a697)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 98763, pass: 83124, fail: 917, skip: 13635, xfail: 1087

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 291 total, 291 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 51 total, 51 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
RE: [PATCH 5.10 00/10] 5.10.116-rc1 review
Posted by Fox Chen 3 years, 12 months ago
On Fri, 13 May 2022 16:23:44 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.116 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.116-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

5.10.116-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
                
Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/10] 5.10.116-rc1 review
Posted by Florian Fainelli 3 years, 12 months ago
On 5/13/22 07:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.116 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.116-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/10] 5.10.116-rc1 review
Posted by Shuah Khan 3 years, 12 months ago
On 5/13/22 8:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.116 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.116-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/10] 5.10.116-rc1 review
Posted by Pavel Machek 3 years, 12 months ago
Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.116 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany