This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.243 release.
There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.243-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 4.19.243-rc1

ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2@huawei.com>
    VFS: Fix memory leak caused by concurrently mounting fs with subtype

Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
    mm: userfaultfd: fix missing cache flush in mcopy_atomic_pte() and __mcopy_atomic()

Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
    mm: hugetlb: fix missing cache flush in copy_huge_page_from_user()

Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
    ALSA: pcm: Fix potential AB/BA lock with buffer_mutex and mmap_lock

Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
    ALSA: pcm: Fix races among concurrent prealloc proc writes

Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
    ALSA: pcm: Fix races among concurrent prepare and hw_params/hw_free calls

Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
    ALSA: pcm: Fix races among concurrent read/write and buffer changes

Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
    ALSA: pcm: Fix races among concurrent hw_params and hw_free calls

Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
    Bluetooth: Fix the creation of hdev->name

Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
    can: grcan: only use the NAPI poll budget for RX

Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
    can: grcan: grcan_probe(): fix broken system id check for errata workaround needs

Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
    nfp: bpf: silence bitwise vs. logical OR warning

Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
    drm/amd/display/dc/gpio/gpio_service: Pass around correct dce_{version, environment} types

Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
    block: drbd: drbd_nl: Make conversion to 'enum drbd_ret_code' explicit

Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
    MIPS: Use address-of operator on section symbols


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                           |   4 +-
 arch/mips/bmips/setup.c                            |   2 +-
 arch/mips/lantiq/prom.c                            |   2 +-
 arch/mips/pic32/pic32mzda/init.c                   |   2 +-
 arch/mips/ralink/of.c                              |   2 +-
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c                       |  13 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/gpio/gpio_service.c |  12 +--
 .../amd/display/include/gpio_service_interface.h   |   4 +-
 drivers/net/can/grcan.c                            |  38 ++++---
 drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_asm.c       |   4 +-
 fs/namespace.c                                     |   9 +-
 include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h                   |   3 +
 include/sound/pcm.h                                |   2 +
 mm/memory.c                                        |   2 +
 mm/userfaultfd.c                                   |   3 +
 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c                           |   6 +-
 sound/core/pcm.c                                   |   3 +
 sound/core/pcm_lib.c                               |   5 +
 sound/core/pcm_memory.c                            |  11 ++-
 sound/core/pcm_native.c                            | 110 +++++++++++++++------
 20 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)

On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 19:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.243 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.243-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 4.19.243-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-4.19.y
* git commit: a96b764d90b5b33d8b7817d4e0da1ea730cc208d
* git describe: v4.19.242-16-ga96b764d90b5
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.242-16-ga96b764d90b5

## Test Regressions (compared to v4.19.241-79-ge28b1117a7ab)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.19.241-79-ge28b1117a7ab)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v4.19.241-79-ge28b1117a7ab)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.19.241-79-ge28b1117a7ab)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 84228, pass: 67603, fail: 1113, skip: 13402, xfail: 2110

## Build Summary
* arm: 275 total, 275 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 19 total, 19 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 55 total, 54 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 04:23:22PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.243 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 425 pass: 425 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

Hi Greg,

On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 04:23:22PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.243 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 12.1.0): 63 configs -> no  failure
arm (gcc version 12.1.0): 116 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 12.1.0): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 12.1.0): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1137


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip

On 2022/5/13 22:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.243 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.243-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Tested on arm64 and x86 for 4.19.243-rc1,

Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-4.19.y
Version: 4.19.243-rc1
Commit: a96b764d90b5b33d8b7817d4e0da1ea730cc208d
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)

arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 8960
passed: 8960
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 8960
passed: 8960
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>

On 5/13/22 8:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.243 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.243-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.243 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4.19.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel



-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany