The double `hush' in the comment in line 1186 is repeated. Remove one
of them from the comment.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
---
 arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
index a9aa6a92c7fe..da6fd141662b 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
@@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static void __init init_swift(void)
 		srmmu_modtype = Swift_lots_o_bugs;
 		hwbug_bitmask |= (HWBUG_KERN_ACCBROKEN | HWBUG_KERN_CBITBROKEN);
 		/*
-		 * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush hush about
+		 * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush about
 		 * this hardware bug... really braindamage stuff going
 		 * on here.  However I think we can find a way to avoid
 		 * all of the workaround overhead under Linux.  Basically,
-- 
2.35.1

On Sun, 2022-05-08 at 10:43 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> The double `hush' in the comment in line 1186 is repeated. Remove one
> of them from the comment.
[]
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
[]
> @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static void __init init_swift(void)
>  		srmmu_modtype = Swift_lots_o_bugs;
>  		hwbug_bitmask |= (HWBUG_KERN_ACCBROKEN | HWBUG_KERN_CBITBROKEN);
>  		/*
> -		 * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush hush about
> +		 * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush about

This is not really a repeated word.

do a google search on "hush hush"

It _might_ sometimes use a dash, like 'hush-hush'