The masking for PAC bits wasn't handling 32-bit architectures correctly.
Replace the u64 cast with uintptr_t.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdVz-J-1ZQ08u0bsQihDkcRmEPrtX5B_oRJ+Ns5jrasnUw@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: 2e53b877dc12 ("lkdtm: Add CFI_BACKWARD to test ROP mitigations")
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
index 804965a480b7..666a7f4bc137 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static void lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO(void)
 #endif
 
 #define no_pac_addr(addr)      \
-	((__force __typeof__(addr))((__force u64)(addr) | PAGE_OFFSET))
+	((__force __typeof__(addr))((uintptr_t)(addr) | PAGE_OFFSET))
 
 /* The ultimate ROP gadget. */
 static noinline __no_ret_protection
-- 
2.32.0

On 4/26/22 17:12, Kees Cook wrote:
> The masking for PAC bits wasn't handling 32-bit architectures correctly.
> Replace the u64 cast with uintptr_t.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdVz-J-1ZQ08u0bsQihDkcRmEPrtX5B_oRJ+Ns5jrasnUw@mail.gmail.com
> Fixes: 2e53b877dc12 ("lkdtm: Add CFI_BACKWARD to test ROP mitigations")
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
fwiw
Thanks.

> ---
>  drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
> index 804965a480b7..666a7f4bc137 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static void lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO(void)
>  #endif
>  
>  #define no_pac_addr(addr)      \
> -	((__force __typeof__(addr))((__force u64)(addr) | PAGE_OFFSET))
> +	((__force __typeof__(addr))((uintptr_t)(addr) | PAGE_OFFSET))
>  
>  /* The ultimate ROP gadget. */
>  static noinline __no_ret_protection

-- 
~Randy

Hi Kees,

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 2:12 AM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> The masking for PAC bits wasn't handling 32-bit architectures correctly.
> Replace the u64 cast with uintptr_t.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdVz-J-1ZQ08u0bsQihDkcRmEPrtX5B_oRJ+Ns5jrasnUw@mail.gmail.com
> Fixes: 2e53b877dc12 ("lkdtm: Add CFI_BACKWARD to test ROP mitigations")
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Thank you, that fixes the m68k allmodconfig build, so
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static void lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO(void)
>  #endif
>
>  #define no_pac_addr(addr)      \
> -       ((__force __typeof__(addr))((__force u64)(addr) | PAGE_OFFSET))
> +       ((__force __typeof__(addr))((uintptr_t)(addr) | PAGE_OFFSET))

Not related to this patch, but "| PAGE_OFFSET" is not identical
to "+ PAGE_OFFSET" for large kernel sizes.

More specifically, I'm thinking about platforms where "large" would
be >= 32 MiB:
arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ar7/spaces.h:#define PAGE_OFFSET
_AC(0x94000000, UL)
or >= 128 MiB:
arch/x86/Kconfig:         default 0x78000000 if VMSPLIT_2G_OPT

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds