Smatch reports this issue
gv100.c:46:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_gsp' was not declared. Should it be static?

gv100_gsp is only used in gv100.c so change its
storage-class specifier to static.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/gv100.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/gv100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/gv100.c
index 2ac7fc934c09..6c4ef62a746a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/gv100.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/gv100.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ gv100_gsp_nofw(struct nvkm_gsp *gsp, int ver, const struct nvkm_gsp_fwif *fwif)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-struct nvkm_gsp_fwif
+static struct nvkm_gsp_fwif
 gv100_gsp[] = {
 	{ -1, gv100_gsp_nofw, &gv100_gsp_flcn },
 	{}
-- 
2.27.0

Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>

Will push upstream in a moment

On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 09:30 -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> Smatch reports this issue
> gv100.c:46:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_gsp' was not declared. Should it be
> static?
> 
> gv100_gsp is only used in gv100.c so change its
> storage-class specifier to static.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/gv100.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/gv100.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/gv100.c
> index 2ac7fc934c09..6c4ef62a746a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/gv100.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/gv100.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ gv100_gsp_nofw(struct nvkm_gsp *gsp, int ver, const struct
> nvkm_gsp_fwif *fwif)
>         return 0;
>  }
>  
> -struct nvkm_gsp_fwif
> +static struct nvkm_gsp_fwif
>  gv100_gsp[] = {
>         { -1, gv100_gsp_nofw, &gv100_gsp_flcn },
>         {}

-- 
Cheers,
 Lyude Paul (she/her)
 Software Engineer at Red Hat