include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Hi all,
After merging the kvm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c: In function 'kvm_prepare_system_event':
arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c:184:32: error: 'struct <anonymous>' has no member named 'flags'
184 | vcpu->run->system_event.flags = flags;
| ^
Caused by commit
c24a950ec7d6 ("KVM, SEV: Add KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN metadata for SEV-ES")
In this commit, the uapi structure changes do not match the documentation
changes :-( Does it matter that the ABI may be changed by this commit
(depending on the alignment of the structure members)?
I have added the following patch or today:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:25:17 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "KVM, SEV: Add KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN metadata for SEV-ES"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index dd1d8167e71f..68ce07185f03 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -448,6 +448,7 @@ struct kvm_run {
#define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_NDATA_VALID (1u << 31)
__u32 type;
__u32 ndata;
+ __u64 flags;
__u64 data[16];
} system_event;
/* KVM_EXIT_S390_STSI */
--
2.35.1
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:34:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the kvm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c: In function 'kvm_prepare_system_event':
> arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c:184:32: error: 'struct <anonymous>' has no member named 'flags'
> 184 | vcpu->run->system_event.flags = flags;
> | ^
>
> Caused by commit
>
> c24a950ec7d6 ("KVM, SEV: Add KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN metadata for SEV-ES")
>
> In this commit, the uapi structure changes do not match the documentation
> changes :-( Does it matter that the ABI may be changed by this commit
> (depending on the alignment of the structure members)?
>
> I have added the following patch or today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:25:17 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "KVM, SEV: Add KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN metadata for SEV-ES"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index dd1d8167e71f..68ce07185f03 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -448,6 +448,7 @@ struct kvm_run {
> #define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_NDATA_VALID (1u << 31)
> __u32 type;
> __u32 ndata;
> + __u64 flags;
> __u64 data[16];
> } system_event;
> /* KVM_EXIT_S390_STSI */
> --
> 2.35.1
I am still applying the above patch.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On 4/27/22 05:23, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> #define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_NDATA_VALID (1u << 31) >> __u32 type; >> __u32 ndata; >> + __u64 flags; >> __u64 data[16]; >> } system_event; >> /* KVM_EXIT_S390_STSI */ >> -- >> 2.35.1 > I am still applying the above patch. I am waiting for review of https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/202204230312.8EOM8DHM-lkp@intel.com/T/. Paolo
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the kvm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c: In function 'kvm_prepare_system_event':
> arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c:184:32: error: 'struct <anonymous>' has no member named 'flags'
> 184 | vcpu->run->system_event.flags = flags;
> | ^
>
> Caused by commit
>
> c24a950ec7d6 ("KVM, SEV: Add KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN metadata for SEV-ES")
>
> In this commit, the uapi structure changes do not match the documentation
> changes :-( Does it matter that the ABI may be changed by this commit
> (depending on the alignment of the structure members)?
Yeah, it's a bit of mess. I believe we have a way out, waiting on Paolo to weigh in.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/YlisiF4BU6Uxe+iU@google.com
On 4/19/22 18:01, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Yeah, it's a bit of mess. I believe we have a way out, waiting on Paolo to weigh in. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/YlisiF4BU6Uxe+iU@google.com Sent out my proposal. For ARM, it is also binary backwards-compatible for 64-bit userspace. Paolo
On 4/19/22 18:01, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> In this commit, the uapi structure changes do not match the documentation >> changes:-( Does it matter that the ABI may be changed by this commit >> (depending on the alignment of the structure members)? > Yeah, it's a bit of mess. I believe we have a way out, waiting on Paolo to weigh in. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/YlisiF4BU6Uxe+iU@google.com > I'll get to it tomorrow morning. Paolo
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.