arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
Add pwm1/backlight support nodes for imx8mm_evk board. Align with u-boot
dts
References:
- https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220326111911.13720-9-tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com/
Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
index 6d67df7692f1..55566708f667 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
@@ -59,6 +59,15 @@ reg_usdhc2_vmmc: regulator-usdhc2 {
enable-active-high;
};
+ backlight: backlight {
+ status = "disabled";
+ compatible = "pwm-backlight";
+ pwms = <&pwm1 0 5000000>;
+ brightness-levels = <0 255>;
+ num-interpolated-steps = <255>;
+ default-brightness-level = <250>;
+ };
+
ir-receiver {
compatible = "gpio-ir-receiver";
gpios = <&gpio1 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
@@ -395,6 +404,12 @@ &wdog1 {
status = "okay";
};
+&pwm1 {
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_backlight>;
+ status = "disabled";
+};
+
&iomuxc {
pinctrl_fec1: fec1grp {
fsl,pins = <
@@ -549,4 +564,10 @@ pinctrl_wdog: wdoggrp {
MX8MM_IOMUXC_GPIO1_IO02_WDOG1_WDOG_B 0x166
>;
};
+
+ pinctrl_backlight: backlightgrp {
+ fsl,pins = <
+ MX8MM_IOMUXC_GPIO1_IO01_PWM1_OUT 0x06
+ >;
+ };
};
--
2.25.1
On 13/04/2022 12:20, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> Add pwm1/backlight support nodes for imx8mm_evk board. Align with u-boot
> dts
>
> References:
> - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220326111911.13720-9-tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
> index 6d67df7692f1..55566708f667 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
> @@ -59,6 +59,15 @@ reg_usdhc2_vmmc: regulator-usdhc2 {
> enable-active-high;
> };
>
> + backlight: backlight {
> + status = "disabled";
Why disabled?
> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> + pwms = <&pwm1 0 5000000>;
> + brightness-levels = <0 255>;
> + num-interpolated-steps = <255>;
> + default-brightness-level = <250>;
> + };
> +
> ir-receiver {
> compatible = "gpio-ir-receiver";
> gpios = <&gpio1 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> @@ -395,6 +404,12 @@ &wdog1 {
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> +&pwm1 {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_backlight>;
> + status = "disabled";
Same here.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 12:28:00PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/04/2022 12:20, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > Add pwm1/backlight support nodes for imx8mm_evk board. Align with u-boot
> > dts
> >
> > References:
> > - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220326111911.13720-9-tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
> > index 6d67df7692f1..55566708f667 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
> > @@ -59,6 +59,15 @@ reg_usdhc2_vmmc: regulator-usdhc2 {
> > enable-active-high;
> > };
> >
> > + backlight: backlight {
> > + status = "disabled";
>
> Why disabled?
>
> > + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> > + pwms = <&pwm1 0 5000000>;
> > + brightness-levels = <0 255>;
> > + num-interpolated-steps = <255>;
> > + default-brightness-level = <250>;
> > + };
> > +
> > ir-receiver {
> > compatible = "gpio-ir-receiver";
> > gpios = <&gpio1 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > @@ -395,6 +404,12 @@ &wdog1 {
> > status = "okay";
> > };
> >
> > +&pwm1 {
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_backlight>;
> > + status = "disabled";
>
> Same here.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof,
I think is better to keep disable into .dtsi and enable it at .dts
level.
What do you think about?
Regards,
Tommaso
--
Tommaso Merciai
Embedded Linux Engineer
tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com
__________________________________
Amarula Solutions SRL
Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT
T. +39 042 243 5310
info@amarulasolutions.com
www.amarulasolutions.com
On 13/04/2022 13:58, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
>>> + backlight: backlight {
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>
>> Why disabled?
>>
>>> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
>>> + pwms = <&pwm1 0 5000000>;
>>> + brightness-levels = <0 255>;
>>> + num-interpolated-steps = <255>;
>>> + default-brightness-level = <250>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> ir-receiver {
>>> compatible = "gpio-ir-receiver";
>>> gpios = <&gpio1 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> @@ -395,6 +404,12 @@ &wdog1 {
>>> status = "okay";
>>> };
>>>
>>> +&pwm1 {
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_backlight>;
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>
>> Same here.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
> I think is better to keep disable into .dtsi and enable it at .dts
> level.
> What do you think about?
Why better? This is already board DTSI, not a SoC DTSI. All boards using
it are supposed to have it available, aren't they?
Usually nodes should be disabled in a DTSI if they need some resources
not available in that DTSI. For example if they need some supply. It's
not the case here, right?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 02:27:00PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/04/2022 13:58, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> >>> + backlight: backlight {
> >>> + status = "disabled";
> >>
> >> Why disabled?
> >>
> >>> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> >>> + pwms = <&pwm1 0 5000000>;
> >>> + brightness-levels = <0 255>;
> >>> + num-interpolated-steps = <255>;
> >>> + default-brightness-level = <250>;
> >>> + };
> >>> +
> >>> ir-receiver {
> >>> compatible = "gpio-ir-receiver";
> >>> gpios = <&gpio1 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> >>> @@ -395,6 +404,12 @@ &wdog1 {
> >>> status = "okay";
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +&pwm1 {
> >>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_backlight>;
> >>> + status = "disabled";
> >>
> >> Same here.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Krzysztof
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > I think is better to keep disable into .dtsi and enable it at .dts
> > level.
> > What do you think about?
>
> Why better? This is already board DTSI, not a SoC DTSI. All boards using
> it are supposed to have it available, aren't they?
>
> Usually nodes should be disabled in a DTSI if they need some resources
> not available in that DTSI. For example if they need some supply. It's
> not the case here, right?
Hi Krzysztof,
Yes, right I check both schematics (DSI_BL_PWM). We can set PWM enable.
I'll update status in v2.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Regards,
Tommaso
--
Tommaso Merciai
Embedded Linux Engineer
tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com
__________________________________
Amarula Solutions SRL
Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT
T. +39 042 243 5310
info@amarulasolutions.com
www.amarulasolutions.com
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.