[PATCH] wlcore: vendor_cmd: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

cgel.zte@gmail.com posted 1 patch 4 years ago
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/vendor_cmd.c | 18 ++++++------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
[PATCH] wlcore: vendor_cmd: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
Posted by cgel.zte@gmail.com 4 years ago
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/vendor_cmd.c | 18 ++++++------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/vendor_cmd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/vendor_cmd.c
index e1bd344c4ebc..e4269e2b0098 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/vendor_cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/vendor_cmd.c
@@ -53,11 +53,9 @@ wlcore_vendor_cmd_smart_config_start(struct wiphy *wiphy,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	ret = wlcore_smart_config_start(wl,
 			nla_get_u32(tb[WLCORE_VENDOR_ATTR_GROUP_ID]));
@@ -88,11 +86,9 @@ wlcore_vendor_cmd_smart_config_stop(struct wiphy *wiphy,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	ret = wlcore_smart_config_stop(wl);
 
@@ -135,11 +131,9 @@ wlcore_vendor_cmd_smart_config_set_group_key(struct wiphy *wiphy,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	ret = wlcore_smart_config_set_group_key(wl,
 			nla_get_u32(tb[WLCORE_VENDOR_ATTR_GROUP_ID]),
-- 
2.25.1
Re: wlcore: vendor_cmd: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()
Posted by Kalle Valo 4 years ago
cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:

> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Patch applied to wireless-next.git, thanks.

d8e11976d8e8 wlcore: vendor_cmd: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220413093939.2538825-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches